Premium
This is an archive article published on February 6, 2006

New rules: Dravid plays it safe

It may not have served its full trial period of 10 months but the opinions, particularly the rules about the super-sub, have been strong. Wh...

.

It may not have served its full trial period of 10 months but the opinions, particularly the rules about the super-sub, have been strong. While many skippers have called for scrapping it altogether, some suggest teams to name their super-subs after the toss. Inzamam is one such man while Dravid 8212; true to his nature 8212; preferred to play it safe.

8216;8216;It8217;s still under the trial period, so let8217;s try and work out new combinations and stretch it to the maximum. At the end of the period all skippers will have to give in their suggestions and so will I,8221; says Dravid.

For the moment this rule stands and teams have to name their super-sub in advance. And this gets into a tricky situation, especially in the sub-continent where teams winning the toss stand to gain outright. Dravid believes 8216;8216;specialists 8212; batsman or bowler 8212; are better of doing that duty because if you have a good all-rounder why not utilise him in the first XI and get his full services?8221;

Unlike Pakistan, Dravid doesn8217;t have the luxury of all-rounders; instead he has to make good with bits-and-pieces players. Even from this team, Sreesanth, Raina, Murali Kartik and Gambhir have been used as super-subs before and two of them, Gambhir and Sreesanth, have failed.

This apart, the use of power-play is another deciding factor. Both teams have a long list of strokemakers, batsmen who can hit the ball from the meat of the bat and carry on through the innings.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement