By refusing to name him,Modis opponents lend him a dark fascination
On Sunday,Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar walked out of the NDA,muttering that there was no other way in the BJPs new era. To be named PM,a candidate had to rally the support of 272 MPs,sniffed Nitish,and people were mistaken if they thought there was a wave or storm blowing their way. The elevation of a certain someone at the BJPs Goa meet seems to have been the last straw for the JDU. But party president Sharad Yadav was quick to point out on Monday that he had never mentioned anyones name,neither had Nitishji. Narendra Modi who?
The name on everybodys lips may be Modi but they seem curiously bashful about uttering it. Nitish,for one,has long perfected the art of referring to Modi by describing who he is not a leader like Vajpayee who could carry everyone along,someone with high secular credentials,someone who would wear a skull cap for communal peace. The Congress shares this coyness. Campaigning in Gujarat before the 2012 assembly polls,the PM spoke abstractly of liberating the state from divisive politics,while Sonia Gandhi wondered aloud how Central funds sent to Gujarat were spent. Even senior BJP leader L.K. Advani,during his recent shortlived revolt after the Goa meet,spoke of lost ideals and the new direction that the party had taken,rather than a pesky former protégé.
By casting him as he-who-must-not-be-named,Modis opponents have lent him a dark fascination. Invoked,never named,the image of the leader has acquired mythic proportions. In peoples imaginations,he makes a picturesque advance towards Delhi,complete with chappan inch ki chhati and a fearsome hoonkar. His opponents would be much better off naming him. Modi the mortal is easier to fight than Modi the Goliath-like spectre.