Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
The Supreme Court Monday refused to entertain a petition by a social group,seeking a judicial examination of the manner in which political parties issued whips to their MPs and MLAs.
We cannot entertain this at your instance. What if tomorrow these members of political parties come and tell us they are amenable to the party discipline. They may question why are we interfering, said a Bench of Chief Justice of India P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana P Desai.
Appearing for the NGO Samta Andolan Samiti,senior advocate Gopal Subramaniam however pointed out that Benchs intervention was imminent since an office memorandum issued by the Law Ministry in March this year was violative of the court orders. The new memorandum says political parties can issue whips to its members for any amendment whereas the Supreme Court has clarified that the whips could be issued only during no-confidence motion and when a party pursued a policy in sync with its election manifesto, he said. The Bench however retorted: Whether all elected members are unaware of this memorandum? Who are you to raise objections? Whether any member is before us and raise objections?
While dismissing the petition,the Bench however kept the question of law open,saying it may entertain a petition in future if it is moved by an affected member,citing his rights.
On the last date,the Bench had maintained that cases like this were the illustrations where the court clearly lacked a role and it would be criticised for encroaching on legislatures business if it chose to entertain such issues.
The Delhi High Court had in April dismissed the PIL against political parties issuing whip during passage of a Constitution amendment Bill for SC-ST reservation in promotion in government jobs. The HC had noted that the petitioner had failed to bring on record any material to show that whether the proposed 117th constitutional amendment was not in terms of the previous Supreme Court guidelines on issuing whips.