Audit objection

Continuing economic growth would require millions of unskilled and casual workers to acquire new skills and enter the manufacturing sector. Having rewarded unskilled labour,the government must now find a way to encourage skill development. It can encourage rural industries,for instance. If NREGA funds subsidised the training of the workforce,corporations would be more inclined to enter the hinterland and source their labour locally. Job guarantees in industry would also reduce local resistance,which has plagued several projects in the past. The problems raised by corruption are harder to deal with. From its inception,NREGA had insisted on transparent,stringent and continuous audit procedures,both financial and social. And yet,these measures have proved to be insufficient. Corruption in the allocation of work is not unusual,but it is rarely reflected in audits. Perhaps the scheme needs to have punitive penalties for corruption.

NREGA had three major goals political,social and developmental. The first two would appear to have been secured to some extent. Employment guarantees may be expected to serve the UPA well in elections the Congress certainly hopes they will do so. In the villages,social mobility has increased,gender disparities are slowly falling and the rate of migration to cities seems to have declined. However,development offers a more complicated story. The literature on NREGA focuses on financial empowerment,detailing how much has been paid out,and to how many people. There is less concern in government about what these payments were for. Outside government,there are misgivings about public works being commissioned where none is required,simply to meet expenditure quotas. NREGA is a transitional intervention for building meaningful infrastructure and paving the way to an employable society that will not need its support. These are its real developmental goals,towards which it should now work,and thereby make itself redundant.