
PEOPLE in physics narrate this story with glum faces.
Senior scientists once scrolled down the list of names at a three-week school for advanced PhD students. As usual, half were from West Bengal. But South India was invisible.
Surprised, they checked again and again. There was not a single name from the stronghold of pure sciences and C V Raman.
8220;Their numbers drop every year but once, in 2000, we noticed with alarm that there were zero students from the South. We are clearly losing scientists to infotech,8217;8217; says Mukhi, dean of graduate studies at Mumbai8217;s Tata Institute of Fundamental Research TIFR. He often wonders whether his PhD students will return to India from post-doctoral work at Princeton and Stanford.
Many have similar stories to tell, worry signs picked up from labs pining for a bustling, excited young crowd.
8220;Top quality scientists are just not easy to find. Even the quality of the top 100 at interviews is below par. So we can8217;t select most of them,8217;8217; N V Madhusudana, dean research, Raman Research Institute, Bangalore, told The Sunday Express in a telephone interview.
Madhusudana morosely describes that Bangalore colleges are closing down physics divisions because the students are missing; most students fly abroad. 8216;8216;We are suffering, just like any subject that involves actual lab work is suffering, because you can always go to the US and find a better equipped lab.8217;8217;
|
8216;8216;Since the 1990s, the number of foreign-born scientists and engineers in USA started has been growing at a smooth 10 pc a year. By 1999, India and China were the top source nations for skilled labour in the US market, an area dominated in the 8217;70s by Germany, Canada and the UK.
In the seaside labs of the TIFR, where students work the computers 24/7 3 am and dawn are normal, the number of new PhD members in the fold have stayed constant for the last 15 years: 15-18 in physics, 8-10 in biology, one or two in pure mathematics. The average age of academic staff hovers between 35 and40.
TIFR8217;s school of natural sciences has recruited 18 people in the last five years. 8216;8216;That8217;s not bad. But it8217;s not great either and we lose people at the entry level, to the US,8217;8217; says Deepak Mathur, professor of atomic and molecular sciences. Sometimes they have to ask PhD students 8212; selected from 800-1,000 applications 8212; to leave after an initial training period because they show no promise.
8216;8216;Students may think that TIFR doesn8217;t have the sound of Harvard or Stanford. When the US clamps down on visas, we suddenly get more and better applications,8217;8217; says Mukhi.
In Pune, Naresh Dadhich, successor to astrophysicist Jayant Narlikar as director of the Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, wonders how to stop a head-hunting headache that dates back a decade.
8216;8216;We have a faculty of 13 when the ideal number is 20. For the last 10-15 years we have not found the right people for these posts. We don8217;t get as many PhD students as we would like either: we get two or three when we can take in seven or eight per year,8217;8217; he says. Then he adds, 8216;8216;seriously8217;8217;.
Mumbai8217;s Forensic Science Laboratory, the state headquarters in forensics, rushes a specialised team headed by just three scientific officers to sift through blast sites. Their bloody routine after bomb blasts is a night spent at the site, followed by a day in the labs, with not a moment8217;s rest in between.
8216;8216;I have 134 sanctioned posts lying vacant, starting from director, deputy director and assistant directors. Most recruitments stopped in the 8217;90s. Ideally, I need another 167 hands,8217;8217; says the lab8217;s acting director Rukmini Krishnamurthy.
Pune8217;s High Energy Material Research Laboratory struggles to go ballistic. 8216;8216;Mathematicians are a dying breed in India. When we source projects to university students, too often the quality of research is below par,8217;8217; says Haridwar Singh, director.
On a Delhi visit, Mathur checked the age profile of a Council for Scientific and Industrial Research laboratory out of sheer curiosity. 8216;8216;I was shocked to find that 70 per cent of the scientists were above the age of 50. That8217;s very unhealthy!8217;8217;
The manpower crunch is felt selectively, gnawing at government labs and old-time hotties like physics, chemistry and mathematics being toppled by biology and IT. There is no panic, yet.