ED challenges trial court order allowing AAP minister Satyendar Jain to have lawyer during questioning

Newsletter | Click to get the day’s best explainers in your inbox

Advocate Zoheb Hossain, representing the ED, submitted that the trial court has laid down certain conditions while granting the remand, including the presence of a lawyer. “We are seeking to assail it, otherwise our remand period would be rendered infructuous,” said Hossain.

Allowing a prayer made by Jain’s counsel on Tuesday, the Special Judge of Rouse Avenue Court in the remand order said, “it is directed that during the time of enquiry/interrogation from the accused, one advocate of the accused shall be allowed to remain present at a safe distance where from he can see the accused but not hear him”. The prayer had been “vehemently” opposed by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who represented the ED before the trial court.

The ED had arrested Jain on May 30 in an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) registered by it on the basis of a case registered by CBI, in August 2017, under the Prevention of Corruption Act. He is accused of having laundered money through five companies allegedly linked to him. ED’s case is that Jain allegedly acquired assets from 2015 to 2017, which were “disproportionate to his known sources of income”. Jain’s counsel argued that his role in the companies was in a consultative capacity and he was given shares in the companies for his services.