Politics that can overcome the trust and development deficits is the need of the hour in Egypt
Thomas L. Friedman
In every civil war,there is a moment before all hell breaks loose,when there is still a chance to prevent a total descent into the abyss. Egypt is at that moment.
Can Egypt hold together and move forward as a unified country,or will it be torn asunder by its own people,like Syria? Nothing is more important in the Middle East today,because when the stability of modern Egypt is at stake sitting as it does astride the Suez Canal,the linchpin of any Arab peace with Israel and knitting together North Africa,Africa and the Middle East the stability of the whole region is at stake.
I appreciate the anger of non-Islamist,secular and liberal Egyptians with President Mohamed Morsi. He never would have become president without their votes,but,once in office,instead of being inclusive,at every turn he grabbed for more power. With Egypts economy in a tailspin,I also appreciate the impatience of many Egyptians with Morsis rule. But in the Arab worlds long transition to democracy,something valuable was lost when the military ousted Morsis government and did not wait for the Egyptian people to do it in Octobers parliamentary elections,or the presidential elections three years down the road. It gives the Muslim Brothers a perfect excuse not to reflect on their mistakes and change,which is an essential ingredient for Egypt to build a stable political centre.
But Egypts non-Islamists,secular and liberal groups need to get their act together,too. The Egyptian opposition has been great at mobilising protests but incapable of coalescing around a single leaders agenda,while the Brotherhood has been great at winning elections but incapable of governing. So now there is only one way for Egypt to avoid the abyss: the military,the only authority in Egypt today,has to make clear that it ousted the Muslim Brotherhood for the purpose of a reset, not for the purposes of revenge for the purpose of starting over and getting the transition to democracy right this time,not for the purpose of eliminating the Brotherhood from politics. Egypt will not be stable if the Brotherhood is excluded.
Dalia Mogahed,the CEO of Mogahed Consulting and a long-time pollster in the Middle East,remarked to me that the original 2011 revolution that overthrew Mubarak was mounted by young people,leftists,liberals,Islamists,united for a better future.The division was between those revolutionaries and the status quo. The revolution wasnt owned by the secularists or the liberals or the Islamists. Thats why it worked. She is right: Muslim Brothers can kill more secularists; the military can kill more Muslim Brothers; but another decade of the status quo in Egypt will kill them all.
The Brotherhood posits that Islam is the answer. The military favours a return to the deep state of old. But more religion alone is not the answer for Egypt today,and while the military-dominated deep state may provide law and order and keep Islamists down,it cant provide the kind of fresh thinking and educational,entrepreneurial,social and legal reforms needed to empower and unleash Egypts considerable human talent and brainpower. In truth,the 2002 UN Arab Human Development Report is the answer,which,by the way,was mostly written by Egyptian scholars. It called on Egyptians to focus on building a politics that can overcome their debilitating deficits of freedom,education and womens empowerment. That is the pathway Egypt needs to pursue not Mubarakism,Morsi-ism or military rule and the job of Egypts friends now is not to cut off aid and censure,but to help it gradually but steadily find that moderate path.