Premium
This is an archive article published on November 21, 2009

SteelMin against states alone deciding mining leases

The steel and mines ministries are locked in a bitter turf war on amending the existing Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation (MMDR) Act.

The steel and mines ministries are locked in a bitter turf war on amending the existing Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation (MMDR) Act. The mines ministry has proposed giving states full powers to allocate mining leases by removing the clause that requires them to seek Centre’s prior approval to do so under the Draft MMDR Act,1957. But the steel ministry has opposed the move saying it would jeopardise long-term interests of the steel industry.

Currently the mines ministry’s prior approval is required before states can hand out mining leases. The ministry has,in Section 8 of the Draft MMDR Act,sought to “devolve full powers” to states. This would allow states to independently decide lease allocation.

Steel minister Virbhadra Singh has written to his mines ministry counterpart,B K Handique,asking him to retain the procedure of seeking Centre’s prior approval for allocation of mining leases of “strategic minerals” — such as iron ore,chrome ore and manganese ore — to ensure their utilisation is “in the larger public interest.”

Story continues below this ad

Arguing that his ministry was squarely responsible for growth and development of the “user industry”,the steel minister has gone on to suggest it would be better if his ministry was “involved in the process of granting concessions for strategic minerals”.

Pointing out that iron ore was the lifeline of the steel industry,Singh surprisingly suggested: “If (the) mines ministry is finding it difficult to regulate and manage the process of granting of prior approval of mineral concessions for major minerals,(the) steel ministry will be willing to accept taking over this function of grant of prior approval for mineral concessions for iron ore,chrome ore and manganese ore,if the procedure of prior approval is continued.”

Singh also wrote that by doing away with the procedure of prior approval “the Central government may be charged with abdicating its constitutional responsibilities,besides disturbing the sensitive and delicate balance of Centre-state relationship in regulation of mineral resources”. The minister opposed the clause of premature termination of mining leases for major minerals by state,saying here too the provision of seeking the Centre’s prior approval be ensured.

In his letter,Singh wrote that mineral resources are national assets and their allocation and utilisation be done treating the country as a “single economic space”. The minister also said there have been instances “of state governments being swayed by local parochial interests while allocating mineral concessions overlooking national interests.”


Draft MMDR Act sparks off turf war

Story continues below this ad

• Currently,the mines ministry’s prior approval is required before states can hand out mining leases

• In the Draft MMDR Act,mines ministry seeks to allow states to independently decide lease allocation

• Steel minister writes to mines minister to retain procedure of seeking Centre’s approval for allocation of mining leases of “strategic minerals”

• Says there have been instances of states being swayed by local interests while allocating mineral concessions

Story continues below this ad

• Also suggests it would be better if his ministry was “involved in the process of granting concessions for strategic minerals”

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement