Entrusted to advise on renovation and rejuvenation of higher education,Professor Yashpal has set an agenda for some radical changes reforms which Union Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal hopes to start incorporating in his 100-day plan. Besides objecting to a number of practices prevalent in the higher education sector,the committee has recommended the setting up of a National Commission for Higher Education and Research NCHER,an overarching body which will subsume 13 regulatory agencies in higher education and create an enabling environment for universities to become self-regulatory bodies. The 94-page report has proposed that in order to ensure the NCHERs independence and credibility,its chairperson should be chosen by a selection panel comprising the PM,the Leader of Opposition and the Chief Justice of India. The proposed commission should table an annual state of higher education report in Parliament.
Some of the other observations of the committee:
Family-run institutions
Since there are no eligibility criteria to judge private investors suitability to foray into the higher education sector,apart from their registration as a charitable trust or society,this lacuna has been exploited. Trusts or societies that have been formed largely consist of immediate family members some of whom have little or no educational background with some exceptions, says the report,adding that there are allegations that funds used to run such institutions are either unaccounted wealth from business and political enterprises or from capitation fees. It says the practice of conferring academic designations such as chancellor,vice-chancellor,and pro vice-chancellor on members of the family must be done away with.
Appointment of teachers
In many private educational institutions,the appointment of teachers is made at the lowest possible cost. They are treated with scant dignity,thereby turning away competent persons from opting for teaching profession8230;, the report says. There are terrible instances of faculty being asked to work in more than one institution belonging to the management; their salary being paid only for nine months; actual payments being much less than the amount signed for8230; compelling them to award pass marks to favourites.
Deemed universities
Between 1956 and 1990,only 29 institutions were granted deemed university status. In the last 15 years,63 institutions were declared deemed universities and in the last five years,36 institutions,excluding RECs,have been notified as deemed universities. What has raised concern is the fact that the majority of these institutes are not established with any educational purpose and they end up only deluding the students. The granting of deemed status should be put on hold till unambiguous and rational guidelines are evolved.
Private universities
The behaviour of some private universities has become a matter of serious concern many of them professional colleges that got approval from regulatory bodies for university status. Immediately thereafter,they started admitting five to six times their intake capacity,without a corresponding increase in faculty strength or academic infrastructure, the report says. The classes were conducted at strange hours like a factory8230;. The students who paid huge capitation fees felt cheated.
Political interference
Interference from various political or commercial vested interests in the functioning of the universities comes in different forms,the report says. It touches all aspects of higher education and involves improper admission of students,pressures in selection of teachers,manipulation in appointment of senior functionaries like vice-chancellors,registrars and deans,purchase of equipment and allotment of construction contracts and so on8230;. It has resulted in a situation where it has become easy for some of those in power and in the bureaucracy to curtail the autonomy as the academic community has proved itself to be unworthy of practicing it, the report says.