Premium
This is an archive article published on August 19, 2005

Reckless in Washington

One of the most painful experiences is to depart, for good, even from a rented house. The departure of the 8,000 or so Jewish settlers from ...

.

One of the most painful experiences is to depart, for good, even from a rented house. The departure of the 8,000 or so Jewish settlers from Gaza has an undeniable poignancy to it. But the huge melodrama the western media has sought to project, distorts the focus when this solitary event is placed against the epic tragedy that is being played out in the Middle East.

In funereal tones, a solemn looking reporter describes columns of Israeli troops carrying away two young boys, kicking and screaming, like they were being forced to go to school. 8216;8216;Settlers must not blame the troops; they must blame me8217;8217;, says Ariel Sharon, emoting pain. They could have given him a glycerine tear or two for heightened effect.

But everybody knows that protecting 8,000 settlers with 21,000 troops was not cost effective. Hence the withdrawal. Meanwhile, occupation continues on a much larger scale on the West Bank. The Palestinians will not be allowed to have their own airport, port, even access to their own cities in the West Bank. Says Mohammad 8216;8216;we travel to Amman or Cairo to catch our flights8217;8217;. But travelling to Amman or Cairo is by itself a forbidding expedition.

The Palestinian Authority now has to prove that it can manage Gaza, above all, control terror. But terror grows because Palestinian lands are occupied. So you have the dog chasing the tail: end terror so that occupation ends: end occupation so that terror ends.

The Iraq war has now acquired two faces: in Iraq and Crawford, Texas. President Bush may have been able to spin his way through two elections but now American democracy seems to be catching up with him in the form of Cindy Sheehan, whose son was killed in Iraq. She is drawing full houses picketing outside the Bush ranch. In Iraq, the war gets more nasty. The deadline for the new Constitution has been extended because there is disagreement on whether 8216;8216;Islam8217;8217; will be one of the sources for laws or the only source.

Ahmad Chalabi carried the interim Constitution, drawn up under Paul Bremer8217;s auspices, for Ayatullah Sistani8217;s approval in Najaf, in March 2003. Sistani rejected 8216;8216;one-of-the-sources8217;8217; concept. That constitution also suggested two languages for Iraq 8212; Arabic and Kurdish. If Sistani rejected a formulation over two years ago, why will he accept it now?

Meanwhile the Shias have upped the ante. They have called for a separate southern area within a federal arrangement. To balance the Kurdish language, Farsi is being sought to be inserted as one of the languages. As if this was not troubling enough, Iran is being brought into focus as a bigger trouble spot under President Ahmedinejad.

Story continues below this ad

8216;8216;All options are on the table8217;8217;, said President Bush, if Iran does not comply on the nuclear issue. Scott Ritter, former UN Inspector, has been citing 8216;8216;high sources8217;8217; for the past few months for some sort of US action.

Precipitate action on Iran seemed out of the question until the other day because Washington was overstretched in Iraq. In fact, a dual policy on Teheran has been in operation: public outrage on the nuclear issue but private gratitude for Iran not 8216;8216;messing8217;8217; in Iraq, Afghanistan, Baluchistan Pakistan, Hizbullah Lebanon. Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim Jafri travelled to Teheran; Iran8217;s Foreign Minister Kamal Kharazzi travelled from Baghdad to Najaf. Neither of these trips was possible without American help.

But there are new, tentative signals in the air. Suddenly an item appears that Iranian arms are reaching Iraqi insurgents. Why this switch on Iran? Because Iraq will be an electoral liability in the spring mid-term elections in the US. An air attack on Iran, according to administration hawks, will go down well with an electorate which, by that time, will have been fed on demonised images of President Ahmedinejad.

Sharon, having shown 8216;8216;reasonableness8217;8217; on Gaza, may be tempted or encouraged for a pre-emptive strike. An Anglo-American action would then be projected as more 8216;8216;responsible8217;8217;. Of course, the whole region will be ablaze and oil prices will go beyond the ceiling. But will this blaze not be preferable to a nuclear armed Iran?

Story continues below this ad

Look how reversals in Iraq are encouraging leaders like Islam Karimov of Uzbekistan to close down a key US base in Khanabad. And all of this is coinciding with the US President8217;s lowest ever ratings.

There is confusion in Washington 8212; just the sort of atmosphere when illogical acts are presented as the emergency escape route. Historically, the US has been capable of both Hiroshima and Vietnam. Which one will it be this time? The third more attractive option will evolve if Washington pushes Sharon on the path of peace. Many situations will change then, even in Iraq. Meanwhile, the media8217;s focus on Cindy Sheehan will keep recklessness in check in Washington.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement