Kanchi case: Two more point finger at cops
Police investigating the Sankararaman murder case, involving Kanchi Shankaracharya Jayendra Saraswati, have been further pushed to the wall ...

Police investigating the Sankararaman murder case, involving Kanchi Shankaracharya Jayendra Saraswati, have been further pushed to the wall with two more of the accused alleging foul play.
Their petition to the Judicial Magistrate here today indicates that the police were trying to rig the identification parade. The accused — Mattu Bhasker and Silvester alias Stalin — had surrendered at the Tiruvattiyur court on November 5. Later, the Magistrate’s court in Kanchipuram ordered their judicial custody for 15 days, on November 19. But, the petition says, instead of taking them directly to the Central jail in Chennai, the police took the accused to the SP’s office in Kanchipuram. The two were interrogated there, without the court’s knowledge.
The petition also says the police brought Sankararaman’s widow, Padma, and her two children to the SP’s office, and introduced them to the accused. This was done even though Padma and her children may have been for an identification parade. Speaking to The Indian Express, defence lawyer Darwin Wisdom said he had information that Sankararaman’s family subsequently took part in an identification parade at Chennai jail. The police, however, refused to comment on this.
In a surprise move, the state government today replaced S. Davidson, the SP of Kanchipuram, who was overseeing investigations into the case. Davidson’s transfer orders were issued from Chennai barely hours after the PM’s letter, advising care and caution in the case, had reached Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa’s office. The Cuddalore SP, Prem Kumar, would assume charge in place of Davidson.
Shift case out of TN: Advani
|
|||||
• RANCHI: Echoing VHP general secretary Pravin Togadia, BJP president L.K. Advani on Friday demanded that the case against the Kanchi Shankaracharya be shifted out of Tamil Nadu. Unlike Togadia, Advani didn’t specify where the case should be heard. He said the BJP’s demand had been made because there was a precedence. The precedence includes the fact that the Supreme Court had intervened (to transfer the riot cases to Mumbai), he added. — ENS |
|||||
This is the second time in the last four days that the police’s role has come under a cloud. Earlier, Kathiravan, the fourth accused in the case, had told the court that he was forced to issue a false confessional statement. Yet another accused, Chinna alias Rajani, had claimed that he lost his teeth due to torture in custody.
The court here also ordered the extension of the Shankaracharya’s judicial remand till December 10. This was followed by the Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court in Saidapet, Chennai, ordering him to judicial remand till December 9 in another case involving former math employee, Radhakrishnan. The Shankaracharya’s lawyers are considering moving a fresh bail application in the Chennai High Court on Monday.
Photos




- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05