Premium
This is an archive article published on August 13, 2008

123, in agreement

The new thing about the new third front? Its political strategy is mimicked by BJP and Congress

.

For a brief moment, in the run-up to the trust vote in Parliament last month, the UNPA seemed like a third front that can. The impression was fleeting, the Manmohan Singh government survived, and the UNPA is back to making news for all the usual third front reasons 8212; the wavering loyalties of some of its constituents in particular.

But for all the apparent similarities, the UNPA is not the nucleus of a born-again third front. To be headed by Mayawati 8212; though she hasn8217;t yet formally joined it 8212; and powered by the Left, it is a redefinition of the third space. In relation to it, the first and second spaces in the polity are being redefined as well.

Some things remain the same. The UNPA just doesn8217;t have the numbers. The 12 parties that could be counted in this alliance in-the-making 8212; including the RLD and JDS that are said to be actively reconsidering their options 8212; add up to less than a hundred seats in the 14th Lok Sabha. Yet the UNPA will be a different third front. It is defined neither by an overriding anti-Congressism, nor an overarching anti-BJPism.

It was vaulting anti-Congressism that originally brought together parties with disparate agendas in a loose grouping in 1977. At that time, the Jana Sangh was part of the Janata Party, therefore the latter might be more correctly described as the second front. Yet the third fronts that came up later would draw their legitimising force, if not their practice, from the political capital spectacularly accumulated and frittered away by the Janata Party. At its peak, it combined a piercing Lohiaiite critique of the Congress with the crusading resistance mounted by the JP movement to the corrupt Congress regime.

A similar anti-Congressism held together the National Front in 1989 with the centrist Janata Dal and regional parties like the DMK, AGP and TDP inside it. Supported by the Left and BJP from outside, the NF faced an awkwardness similar to the one JP grappled with in the mid-8217;70s on account of RSS-Jana Sangh participation in the anti-Congress mobilisation. But in 1989, as in 1977, for 8220;secular forces8221;, sleeping with the Jana Sangh/BJP wasn8217;t an unbearable discomfort.

With the BJP8217;s successful mobilisation on the Ram temple issue, came rampaging anti-BJPism. The United Front government formed in 1996 with the stated objective of keeping the BJP out of power subsisted on Congress support. At one time, former CPM general secretary, E.M.S. Namboodiripad, had declared the choice between the Congress and BJP as one 8220;between cholera and plague8221;; under Harkishan Singh Surjeet, the CPM announced the BJP to be the greater evil. Throughout the 8217;90s, the secular-communal faultline enjoyed pride of place among all-India political cleavages.

In the UNPA, it is not just that nearly all constituents have supped with the BJP or Congress or both. Earlier antagonisms were neither tidy nor pure. What has changed is this: even the overhang of the grand narrative has been dispensed with.

Story continues below this ad

This is not all intended, of course. With the thinning of the Congress at the Centre and in the states through the 8217;90s, anti-Congressism had lost its currency by the turn of this decade. Now, the Left8217;s privileging of 8220;anti-imperialism8221; over 8220;secularism8221; as elections draw near seems to be the belated flagging of another change. The secular-communal divide has lost its relevance as an explanation of the politics of our time.

Two other elements of the new third front underline the unsettling of older political reflexes: the absence of the Janata Dal at its heart and the emergence of the BSP at its head.

The most flamboyant herald bearers of the Janata Dal 8212; born as the left-of-centre alternative to the Congress in 1988 and that split for the 13th time at last count 8212; are within the Congress-led UPA today. Lalu Prasad Yadav has reinvented himself as doughty pillar of a Congress-led regime. Mulayam Singh Yadav has just helped the Manmohan Singh government survive the Left-led onslaught. Ram Vilas Paswan is a crucial Congress ally. With Sharad Yadav having migrated to the BJP-led NDA, the UNPA may have to make do with Deve Gowda and Ajit Singh from the many-splintered Janata parivar.

But nothing drives home the political shift more than Mayawati8217;s leadership role in the third front. Despite her imperfections, Mayawati represents the most radical political impulse to be unleashed in the post-Congress polity. The Dalit leader would be the natural inheritor, therefore, of the mantle of leader of the third alternative in its best version 8212; as the fight against closures built into the bi-polar system. Yet Mayawati8217;s leadership of the UNPA will be a strange thing.

Story continues below this ad

For all her recent efforts to reach out to non-Dalit groups and pitch a broader political tent, she remains uncomfortable with other political leaders and the media. Under her stewardship, the BSP is opportunistic in the most straightforward sense of the term. If Kanshi Ram dispensed with the Dalit dilemma of which must come first 8212; power or structural reform 8212; in favour of the former, Mayawati has steered the BSP to even greater focus. In every crisis at the Centre in recent memory 8212; including the trust vote on July 22 8212; she has displayed the same candid brinkmanship. 8220;The BSP will open its cards only at the end,8221; she says. In other words, the BSP will hold out for the best deal in that situation.

What does this mean for the third front? Sceptics have seen it as a permissive political space, no more than a unity of resentments. In its latest avatar it seems especially stripped down 8212; shorn of both larger-than-life anti-Congressism and anti-BJPism, to be headed by a party that unabashedly leverages its transferable vote base and wears its disdain of political niceties on its sleeve.

The choice is ours. We could see in the UNPA the receding of the hopes and conceits of a third alternative. Or we could see it as a signpost of the political reality that has been with us awhile.

In a fragmented system that is increasingly federal and competitive, strategic considerations will trump ideology for political players. Local compulsions dominate in the parties that are 8220;national8221; as well as those called 8220;regional8221; 8212; in terms of their political calculus, that distinction is a waning one. The single member-simple plurality electoral system, and the fact that decision-making within parties continues to be whimsical, encourages shifting alliances born of ideological flexibility.

Story continues below this ad

For us, then, the question is not: is the third front a third alternative any more? It is, perhaps: when politics becomes a bare-knuckled numbers game, why must the burden of difference rest so disproportionately on the number three?

vandita.mishraexpressindia.com

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement