Premium

Opinion Designing the new babu

The senior-most recruiter to the higher civil services had raised hopes of reform a few weeks ago by listing many proposals as needing consideration.

New DelhiApril 13, 2010 02:28 PM IST First published on: Apr 13, 2010 at 02:28 PM IST

The seniormost recruiter to the higher civil services had raised hopes of reform a few weeks ago by listing many proposals as needing consideration. He has now said that one has to be practical on one of them,namely,reducing the age of entry. The road to hell is paved with so-called practical intentions. The Moilly ARC had strongly proposed that the age of entry should be reduced to the mid-twenties,plus a few years for special categories. Dr Moily was generous enough to acknowledge that this emerged from a committee I had chaired and when the new chief of the UPSC said that it was under consideration,I was happy. When you are foolhardy or adventurous enough to advise governments,you win some and lose some,and it seemed that this may go through. But fate,as Wodehouse said,was waiting around the corner to wallop the idea.

The so-called practical argument given is equity. Poor children take time to mature so they must be given that time. But the argument was false. We found out that candidates from really poor backgrounds,as shown by the district from which they were graduating,was actually going down. Now,this is worrisome. For,the concern that more candidates from poor backgrounds should make the IAS or IPS is an important one,and as a very intelligent Minister from a reserved constituency once told me,it is more important that a poor SC/ST girl or boy becomes a Collector or SP than a Minister. In the present system,since there is no limit on the chances a SC/ST candidate can take; many enter after turning 30. Knowing they will never reach the top,they tend to procrastinate at best,and go the easy way at worst.

Advertisement

I am a former VC of JNU and knew that when you do a nationwide recruitment as in JNU where thousands of kids apply and you take a thousand,you get extraordinary children,because the genetic pool you are mining is very large and throws up the best. Within the SC/ST category you get,at each point,very very intelligent children. I was horrified when a state Minister said recently that tribal girls,trained as airhostesses,are not pretty or don’t have social graces. This is prejudice and rubbish of the worst type. The point I made was that at young ages you get very bright candidates from SC/ST categories,and even if this means a slight relaxation in standards which you can easily make up in training,you must take the plunge. After 30,you will only get urban,better-off candidates,because only they have the money and can wait for years to get in. By that time,they are set in their ways,and you can’t mould them any more.

The case for reducing the age is good and nobody seems inclined to reason against it. I went for a meeting of Common Cause to Delhi since it was set up by the great H D Shourie,and was asked to lobby for the Alagh Committee on higher civil services. I am a university type and said since the Moily report is there,we can relax. I was obviously wrong. But again,you never know. Don’t despair Dr Moily,good ideas have a way of coming back some day.

Curated For You
Weather
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
C Raja Mohan writesA question at Davos — are we back to the era of kings?
X