Pornography scandals in the assembly are also about official hypocrisy
Watching porn in the assembly seems to be the latest occupational hazard of BJP legislators,whether in Gujarat or Karnataka,and this could explain the extraordinary clarity on finer legal points displayed by former BJP minister in Karnataka,Laxman Savadi. He claimed,quite correctly,that his act of watching an obscene video on someone elses phone was not illegal. As recently reiterated by the Bombay high court,possession of pornography is not illegal and only distribution and sale is a criminal offence. There is a thin line dividing possession from distribution,between watching a video on your mobile phone and showing it to two other people,but for the sake of our tenuous collective freedoms,it is an important distinction that we must remind ourselves about.
There are few public networks of circulation that allow for an escape from the stranglehold of state. For instance,there is circulation of amateur video porn,though this does not co-relate to its Western counterpart of industry-produced pornography that is far more explicit and graphic. Amateur video porn in India is often a tiny glimpse into the sexual lives of people like ourselves and has a limited circulation. Perhaps the more pressing legal and ethical quandary raised by some amateur porn is the violation of privacy of individuals and leaking of their images,whether it is a woman who is unaware that she is being taped by her lover,or boys in a hostel who dont know that their bathing is being recorded and uploaded on the internet.
The terms of the debate,however,cannot be about pornography,and the act of legislators watching a pornographic clip of extreme violence in the assembly cannot be brushed aside by the resignation of the individuals involved. What is appalling here is the hypocrisy of the BJP governments that would like to forget that it was their legislators who were caught watching porn,while they continue to speak about declining moral standards. The moral policing by the right wing on sexuality,culture and religion has increased to an alarming extent. In Karnataka,women have been assaulted for their attire,inter-religious couples targeted and churches attacked in the last two years.
Legislators were casually rifling through obscene pictures in their tablet or mobile phone while matters of public interest were discussed in the House. The ordinary employee of an IT company,a teacher or student in a university or anyone in a regular office cannot access generic content on YouTube or friends on Facebook,because of strictures on the network in workplaces. Should a legislator be able to watch porn in the assembly,when I have to negotiate the ban on a relatively benign sexual comic like Savita Bhabhi,or am not allowed to watch an exceptional and artistic film like Gandu (2010) in a cinema hall? In this context,it is not an amusing irony but indeed something that should make us very angry,as the officials of the state are doing exactly what has been disallowed and denied to us.
The larger paradox here is,whatever turn public debate takes now,the anti-pornography position will still be upheld by the BJP,even though they were the ones repeatedly caught with porn in their hands,while the pro-pornography position would be safeguarded by those who are liberal and anti-censorship. The terms of the debate remain unchanged,except those who are saying that pornography should not be censored may now realise that we are indeed speaking up for the rights of legislators to watch porn while they determine the extent of our freedoms.
The writer is with Bangalore-based Alternative Law Forum
express@expressindia.com