Wrong medicine

The governments one-size-fits-all panacea to ensuring quality in educational institutions has been control. How does one ensure teaching quality? Answer: state control. How does one deal with particularly mediocre educational institutions? Answer: even more control. The idea that independence fosters excellence,that the state must regulate quality not squash it,has long been alien to Indian higher education apparatiks. Which is why Union Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibals talk of institutional autonomy especially in the context of IITs and IIMs has been such a refreshing change.

However,consider the recommendations of a UGC-appointed committee,recommendations the UGC has accepted,and ones that the Sibal-appointed committee on deemed universities is said to be in favour of. The Tareen Committee was appointed by the UGC to examine its own haste in giving deemed university status to several institutions. One would suppose that the logical corrective to providing deemed university status to places which are ill-equipped,ill-qualified,and mint-fresh is to revoke that status in fact,another UGC-appointed committee to look into precisely this has been less than stinging. But no,the Tareen Committee recommends that deemed universities must have entrance exams and fees must be fixed by a panel. This is in complete contrast to ideas of institutional autonomy. Private bodies must be free to set their own curricula and determine their own fees. The governments role must be reduced to overseeing excellence,and withdrawing licences in the case of fly-by-night operators. The recommendations,if accepted,would constrict all deemed universities,instead of just shutting down the tardy ones.

At the heart of the matter is the scandal that many institutions enjoying deemed university status have become. Sibals decision to review many decisions pertaining to deemed universities was necessary. But the recommended solution could make a bad situation worse. Instead of being forward looking,it harks back to ideas that the current HRD minister himself aims to move away from. The UGC must not be allowed to compound its initial mistake with another one.