Premium
This is an archive article published on January 22, 2010

Campbells soup

How are the mighty fallen. The scheduling of the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war has allocated to Alastair Campbell...

Listen to this article
Campbells soup
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

How are the mighty fallen. The scheduling of the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war has allocated to Alastair Campbell,once New Labours all-powerful spin doctor,a role little better than that of a warm-up act for the former prime minister. On January 12th he appeared before the five-strong panel,headed by a former senior civil servant,and faced the toughest questioning so far about Britains invasion of Iraq. Tony Blair his friend and erstwhile boss,who takes the hot seat soon will have been watching anxiously.

There were omissions and ambiguities in Mr Campbells testimony that should shape the panels questioning of the former prime minister. There were also pugnacious certainties guaranteed to incite the wars critics. He claimed to stand by every single word of an influential and controversial dossier setting out the governments view of Saddam Husseins weapons of mass destruction WMD in September 2002,and brushed aside as churlish less flattering testimonies given to the inquiry earlier.

Mr Campbell denies pressing intelligence officials to beef up the evidence against Iraq. Observers were left wondering how the claim that Saddams possession of WMD was beyond doubt made it into the foreword to the dossier officially written by Mr Blair. Sir John Scarlett,who chaired the Joint Intelligence Committee at the time of the war,downplayed his own role in concocting that foreword when he testified last month.

Mr Campbell also said that anger at the notorious claim that Iraq could launch a strike within 45 minutes had been overdone. It was not as big a part of the governments case for war as is now remembered,he insisted,and was actually at the conservative end of intelligence estimates. But he conceded it should have been made clear that the figure referred only to Iraqs ability to deploy battlefield munitions.

To the extent that anything new was learned from Mr Campbell,it concerned the workings of the Blair government rather than the vexed question of the intelligence about Iraq. Mr Campbell inadvertently paints a picture of a prime minister isolated from all but his closest aides. Clare Short,the left-winger who resigned as international-development secretary after the invasion,was shut out in case she leaked information to the press. The cabinet as a whole was not privy to letters Mr Blair wrote to President Bush that,according to Mr Campbells recollection,signalled Britains early willingness to back a war against Iraq. It is not clear if these letters will be made public.

The role of the current prime minister then the keeper of the war-chest as chancellor of the exchequer also remains opaque. Gordon Brown,who Mr Campbell says was closely involved in the discussions leading up to war,will not appear before the inquiry until the summer. The panel will adjourn in March to avoid influencing unduly the general election expected shortly thereafter.

The truth is that Iraq is fading from voters minds. Britain officially pulled out last spring. The recession and the rising body-count in Afghanistan are graver worries now. Mr Campbell,despite the advice he still gives Mr Brown,is in fact a ghost from the past. And there have already been four Iraq inquiries,though none as comprehensive as this one.

Story continues below this ad

Some reckon its failure to unearth masses of new information is down to a mix of mendacious reticence on the part of key witnesses and the pusillanimity of their inquisitors. A kinder interpretation may be that,even for the loquacious Mr Campbell,there is not much left to say.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement