Premium
This is an archive article published on November 19, 2009

A PR problem

At Chinas 60th anniversary bash last month,Zhang Yuanyuan,a China-born,permanent resident of Singapore,was caught on camera professing her love for her native country.

At Chinas 60th anniversary bash last month,Zhang Yuanyuan,a China-born,permanent resident of Singapore,was caught on camera professing her love for her native country. The clip caused a storm in the island state; it was the latest sign of resentment towards incomers and evidence that immigration is becoming the city-states dominant political issue.

Faced with an ageing population and low fertility,Singapores government has long courted foreigners to plug gaps in the workforce. In 1990,citizens made up 86 of Singapores 3m people. Today,the share is 64 of 5m-odd. More than one in three people are foreigners permanent residents,known as PRs,and non-residents.

In the past,immigrants were concentrated at the top or bottom of the jobs ladder,performing work that Singaporeans could not or did not want to do. Today,foreigners compete on almost every rung. Some,like geneticists,bring in useful skills. Others-it is feared-displace local skills and depress wages at the bottom.

Such fears are especially sharp during a recession. Critics say PRs enjoy the benefits of citizenship without all the responsibilities,such as national service for men first-generation PRs are generally exempt. Immigrants are said to mix less with Singaporeans than they used to. The rise in numbers means many foreign groups have reached critical mass,producing little ethnic enclaves-the governments bête noire. I am Singaporean and tired of service staff who can only speak Mandarin is a group on Facebook,the social-networking site,with more than 10,000 members.

High immigration has coincided with a widening income gap. Singapores Gini coefficient,a measure of inequality,rose from 0.444 in 2000 to 0.481 in 2008-higher than in China and America. The contrast between the glitzy downtown and the heartlands is glaring,and more damaging in tiny,dense Singapore than it would be in a big country,says Paulin Straughan of the National University of Singapore.

To defuse the pressure,the prime minister,Lee Hsien Loong,says Singapore will slow down the intake of migrants while accentuating the privileges of citizenship. Meanwhile,the government has plonked S10m 7m into the new National Integration Council NIC,which will try to promote interactions between different groups. It will not be easy,as the government admits. The NIC recognises that integration is a long-term effort,and may take years before success is apparent, says Dr Vivian Balakrishnan,the head of the NIC and minister for community development,youth and sports.

But Singaporeans care less about fuzzy notions of integration than their own jobs,says Chung Wai-Keung of the Singapore Management University. He wants employment laws rewritten to favour locals. But this would contradict the governments commitment to an open economy. And the dominance of the ruling Peoples Action Party means that in Singpore-unlike many countries-anti-immigrant sentiment cannot easily gain a strong political voice. Expect no drastic policy changes.

Story continues below this ad

These ripples are part of Singapores transformation from a micro-managed melting pot into a cosmopolitan city-state. Before the internet,it is hard to imagine the debate that raged around the hapless Ms Zhang. Now,many Singaporeans defend her. In the new Singapore,it is all right to love ones country-even if it is China.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement