Premium
This is an archive article published on February 15, 2007

SC: Speaker erred by not deciding on disqualification

While disqualifying the 13 breakaway BSP MLAs, the Supreme Court today held 8220;without hesitation8221; an 8220;error8221; on the part of the then Speaker...

.

While disqualifying the 13 breakaway BSP MLAs, the Supreme Court today held 8220;without hesitation8221; an 8220;error8221; on the part of the then Speaker who specifically refrained from deciding the petition seeking disqualification of the legislators.

8220;On our reasoning, clearly there was an error,8221; came the stinging remark from the Constitutional Bench on the role played by then Uttar Pradesh Speaker Keshrinath Tripathi. 8220;It is clear that the Speaker in the original order left the question of disqualification undecided. Thereby he has failed to exercise the jurisdiction conferred on him by paragraph 6 of the Tenth Schedule,8221; said the Court in its unanimous verdict.

Making it clear that such a failure to exercise jurisdiction cannot be held to be covered by the shield of Tenth Schedule, the Bench even criticised the decision of the Speaker to accept the breakaway MLAs as a split in the party. 8220;He has also proceeded to accept the case of a split merely on a claim in that behalf. He has entered no finding whether a split in the original political party was prima facie proved or not,8221; added the Judges.

As the apex court approved the reasoning given in an earlier judgment in Jagjit Singh8217;s case, Justice P K Balasubramanyan, writing for the Bench, maintained: 8220;It has to be held that the Speaker has committed an error that goes to the root of the matter or an error that is so fundamental that even a limited judicial review of the order of the Speaker has to be interfered with.8221;

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement