
Aprops Maharajakrishna Rasgotra 8216;Piety will not deliver8217;, IE, June 28, perhaps he does not know the correct position as regards the 1965 Indo-Pak war, in which there was no winner or loser.
If we captured some territory in Punjab, Pakistan showed remarkable aggression in the Chhamb-Jaurian and Rajasthan sectors. Our 1971 victory was restricted to erstwhile East Pakistan only, where 90 per cent of the population had risen against the Yahya Khan government.
Of course our aggressive tactics and superior diplomacy in tying up a friendship treaty with USSR did contribute to our success.
After our objective in East Pakistan was achieved, there was no point in continuing the war. We therefore declared an unilateral ceasefire to which Pakistan responded positively and the war ended.
The Simla Agreement was the maximum which we could extract from Pakistan to buy peace. People today do not realise how difficult it was for us to look after 93,000 prisoners of war as per the Geneva convention. There was never any opportunity to clinch the final settlement at Simla.
The current stand off between India and Pakistan after the December 13 attack has been a costly game for both nations. It has only internationalised the Kashmir problem. There is also nothing to be euphoric over Musharraf8217;s admission about terrorist infiltration. Neither he nor an elected government can stop this menace.
We have not gained anything by the threat of force nor are we going to gain anything in future. The threat of force, which the media would like to term 8216;coercive diplomacy8217;, works only when there is a wide gap between the military might of the opponents. Not between countries having the fourth and fifth largest armies in the world.