Premium
This is an archive article published on September 17, 2007

5 myths about terrorism

Six years after 9/11, all too many Americans have only a vague idea of what does 8212; and doesn8217;t 8212; motivate terrorists.

.

Six years after 9/11, all too many Americans have only a vague idea of what does 8212; and doesn8217;t 8212; motivate terrorists. It doesn8217;t help that many politicians exploit the anxiety that terrorism evokes to promote their own agendas. Here are five key urban legends:

8226; Terrorism is a random act carried out by irrational people who hate our way of life.

If only it were that simple. In fact, terrorists are typically motivated by geopolitical grievances, not blind hatred. The agendas of individual terrorist groups vary, but their tactical goal is always more or less the same: to sow fear and confusion by deliberately targeting civilians in order to intimidate a country into changing its policies and ways.

So political calculations are key here. Citizens of countries that occupy other countries, for example, are more likely to be targeted by terrorists. In addition, wealthy democracies are more likely to be the targets of terrorist strikes than are totalitarian regimes, which suggests that terrorists deliberately strike countries that are susceptible to public pressure.

8226; Terrorists are no different than ordinary criminals.

Wrong. Criminals tend to be poor and uneducated. But terrorists tend to come from families with above-average means and are often well-educated. For example, Jitka Maleckova of the Russell Sage Foundation and I found that members of the military wing of the radical Shiite group Hezbollah who were killed in action in the 1980s and 1990s were better educated and less likely to be poor than their Lebanese countrymen.

8226; Terrorists are likely to cross into the United States from Mexico.

This is a favorite chestnut of some activists and politicians keen to tighten immigration and build a fence on the Mexican border. But the historical record doesn8217;t bear it out. Of course, the past may not be a good predictor of the future, but terrorists have rarely crossed into the United States from Mexico. In a recent Nixon Center study of 373 Islamist terrorists, Robert Leiken and Steven Brooke concluded: 8220;Despite widespread alarms raised over terrorist infiltration from Mexico, we found no terrorist presence in Mexico and no terrorists who entered the US from Mexico.8221;

8226; Terrorism is mainly perpetrated by Muslims.

Story continues below this ad

Wrong. No religion has a monopoly on terrorism. Every major religious faith has had followers involved in terrorism. Sri Lanka, for instance, has grappled for decades with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, a separatist group that pioneered suicide bombing as a terrorist tactic and hopes to create a homeland for the country8217;s mostly Tamil minority, who are largely Hindu. Although radical Islamic terrorists are the worry du jour because of 9/11 and Iraq, the data show pretty clearly that the predominant religion of a country is not a good predictor of whether its people will become involved in terrorism.

8226; Terrorism never succeeds.

If terrorism didn8217;t work, it would be far more rare than it now is. Sometimes terrorists do achieve their goals, which is why others continue to try the tactic. Of course, it8217;s not always easy to determine what the terrorists8217; objectives are, but sometimes their goals are pretty clear. Consider the devastating commuter-rail bombings in Madrid in March 2005, three days before Spain held congressional elections. The Islamic radicals who set off the bombs reportedly hoped to change the Spanish government. It worked.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement