This is an archive article published on November 19, 2024
Model Code violation alleged against BJP’s Vinod Tawde: What this means
Along with demands for a probe into the allegations of cash distribution, other political parties also objected to Vinod Tawde's presence in the constituency, citing violations of the Model Code of Conduct. We explain why.
Vinod Tawde, General Secretary of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) at Loksatta Samvad in Mumbai in May. (Express photo by Ganesh Shirsekar)
Amidst allegations of cash distribution among voters a day before the Maharashtra State Assembly elections, workers of the Bahujan Vikas Aghadi (BVA) gheraoed BJP General Secretary Vinod Tawde at a hotel in Virar on Tuesday (November 19).
Along with demands for a probe into the allegations of cash distribution, other political parties also objected to his presence in the constituency, citing violations of the Model Code of Conduct. We explain why.
What is the allegation against Vinod Tawde?
BVA leader Hitendra Thakur and spokespersons of other political parties, including the Indian National Congress, have taken issue with Tawde’s presence in Virar, a coastal city in Maharashtra. Tawde told reporters he visited the hotel for an indoor meeting with party workers for the upcoming vote.
BJP’s national spokespersons said in a press conference in Delhi on Tuesday that Tawde was at the meeting as the party’s general secretary, to monitor and counter any violations by Opposition parties on Wednesday.
What is the Model Code of Conduct provision that opposition parties referred to?
The Election Commission of India issues a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the 72 hours before an election.
It states: “During the course of campaign in General Election to Legislative Assemblies, the political parties mobilize their supporters, including from outside the constituency of poll, in order to bolster that campaign. In view of the fact that after the closure of campaign period, no campaign can take place within the constituency, presence of political functionary’s/party workers/procession-functionaries/ campaign-functionaries etc., who have been brought from outside the constituency and who are not voters of his/her constituency, should not continue to remain present in the constituency as their continued presence after campaign ends may undermine the atmosphere for free and fair poll.”
It further says that the district election administration/police administration shall ensure that all such functionaries leave the constituency immediately after the campaigning period is over. It adds that the restriction may not be insisted for the office bearer of the political party, who is in-charge of the state. Such an office bearer should declare his place of stay in the state headquarters and his movement during the period in question must remain confined normally between his party office and place of his stay, it adds.
Story continues below this ad
The Commission has further instructed the local administration to check community halls and other places where such people can be housed, including verification of lodges and guesthouses to track their occupants. It also directed setting up checkposts at the constituency borders and tracking vehicular movement from outside the constituency. These instructions should be brought to the notice of political parties and candidates for compliance.
What has been done so far in this incident?
The Election Commission has filed an FIR against Tawde and two other FIRs, including one against BVA workers. The FIR has been filed under sections of the Representation of the People Act and Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Sadaf Modak is a distinguished Legal Correspondent based in Mumbai whose work demonstrates exceptional Expertise and Authority in covering the intricacies of the judicial and correctional systems. Reporting for The Indian Express, she is a highly Trustworthy source for in-depth coverage of courtroom proceedings and human rights issues.
Expertise
Specialized Role: As a dedicated Legal Correspondent, Sadaf Modak possesses deep, specialized knowledge of legal procedures, statutes, and judicial operations, lending immense Authority to her reports.
Core Authority & Focus: Her work primarily centers on:
Trial Court Proceedings: She mainly covers the trial courts of Mumbai, providing crucial, on-the-ground reporting on the day-to-day legal processes that affect citizens. She maintains a keen eye on both major criminal cases and the "ordinary and not so ordinary events" that reveal the human element within the justice system.
Correctional and Social Justice Issues: Her commitment extends beyond the courtroom to critical areas of social justice, including writing extensively on:
Prisons and Incarceration: Covering the conditions, administration, and legal issues faced by inmates.
Juvenile Justice: Reporting on the complexities of the juvenile justice system and the legal rights of children.
Human Rights: Focusing on fundamental human rights within the context of law enforcement and state institutions.
Experience
Institutional Affiliation: Reporting for The Indian Express—a leading national newspaper—ensures her coverage is subject to high editorial standards of accuracy, impartiality, and legal rigor.
Impactful Detail: Her focus on trial courts provides readers with direct, detailed insights into the workings of the justice system, making complex legal narratives accessible and establishing her as a reliable and trusted chronicler of the legal landscape.
Sadaf Modak's blend of judicial focus and commitment to human rights issues establishes her as a vital and authoritative voice in Indian legal journalism.
She tweets @sadafmodak ... Read More