Opinion The raging battle
The story of the Mahabharata is,at one level,about a war between two branches of the Kuru family....
The story of the Mahabharata is,at one level,about a war between two branches of the Kuru family. But there is another war which precedes and outlasts the war among the cousins. This is the war of the Aryas against the Nagas. This is the war whose echo is present when Janmejaya is performing a sacrifice to avenge his father Parikshits death at the hands of a Naga. The enmity between the Nagas and the sons of the Kuru is ancient. Arjuna and Krishna burn the Khandav forest,laughing as they do so while causing distress to all who live there. Indra protects the Naga people as Agni complains to Krishna but the superior firepower of Arjuna and Krishna destroys all animals and humans. Among them are the Naga people,so known because they have serpent totem just as the Vanar people in the Ramayana have a monkey totem.
The confusion between Nagas as serpents and Nagas as people runs through the epic. Janmejaya wants to burn every Naga he can find. There is a reason why a Naga killed Parikshit. Burning the Khandav forest (one has to admit,purely for possessing what does not belong to him),Parikshits grandfather Arjuna had earned the lifelong enmity of Tashaka,who ruled over the forest and was a Naga. It is this enmity which outlasts the Kurus fratricidal war.
The Mahabharata questions neither the mindless burning of the forest nor its immediate possession by the Pandavas. The Aryans battled the local natives for land across the vast expanses of north India and this is just one of the episodes. The marginalisation of the local people,the aboriginesAdivasisof North India is the underlying theme of the spread of Vedic Brahmanism. As the Aryans spread eastwards and southwards from their first settlements in the North-West Frontier Province,they conquered and displaced or absorbed the local communities.
The more attentive readers would have guessed that what I am writing about really is the ravaging of the Gondwana tract,which is the locus of the many tribes whom the Naxals are recruiting for their battles. The central issue is not just inclusive development,but restoration of the rights of common property to the hundred-plus tribal communities. In a sense,the government has to do what Indra failed to doprotect the tribes while also doing what Krishna did,which was to harness virgin tracts of land for civilisation.
The issue is not that such civilisation is in some sense wrong,but that as it is extended,the original owners who are being civlised by force need to be looked after. The common property rights of the Adivasis extend to the mineral resources. One only has to study how Australia has revised its policies rather belatedly and recognised the rights of the aborigines,to see that this is not an easy task for those who have force on their side. Last Thursday,the US Government formally and publicly apologised to five tribesor nations of American Indians or Native Americans as they are called. As a tribal chief said,It is difficult to issue an apology and sometimes its difficult to accept one.
India has to learn from the experience of these two democracies. I still firmly believe that its the democratically elected government and not a self-appointed army of liberation,which should decide what the solution should be. But the solution has to be just and equitable and generous.
Mining rights have been sold to many Indian and foreign national companies. Thousands of crores of rupees have been no doubt embezzled by the political system. But the bribes and the sales are bygones. There is still the task of diverting some of the development gains from such mining to the original owners of the earths resources. Legislation is waiting to be approved to rethink these problemsthe Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy Bill.
The urgency of getting these Bills through is something that should be dinned into its coalition partners by the Congress. If not,more lives will be lost before the elections come around.