Premium
This is an archive article published on January 8, 2012
Premium

Opinion Sparkling quality a global nextmark?

Indian industry is married to quality processes,but not to perceptible quality in the customer’s hand that Japanese and Korean companies deliver

January 8, 2012 02:08 AM IST First published on: Jan 8, 2012 at 02:08 AM IST

Indian industry is married to quality processes,but not to perceptible quality in the customer’s hand that Japanese and Korean companies deliver. Implementing quality process engineering is a hygiene factor that delivers no competitive edge. Unless the society’s state of mind is driven by the consciousness of quality supremacy,no quality system will fall in place for Indian brands to meet the challenge of global competition. Quality in customer hand first creates trust; in long-term usage,it becomes believable. It’s totally non-visible,a hidden factor. The customer experiences this quality at the discretion of the enterprise providing it.

In workshops for Indian companies,whenever I’ve tried to expose the hidden quality factor that creates customer trust and loyalty,I’ve confronted a wall called quality process. R&D engineers,marketing,customer service and top management revere ISO,TQM,Deming or Six Sigma quality which translate to working in a system that brings discipline and defect-free processes. But when every company follows the same system in a category,does it create differentiation that the customer receives?

Advertisement

Some of my professional friends who’ve undergone my training sessions and are now working expatriates in Germany and Korea,have called me to endorse this “quality spark” that customers want. They’ve said they’re actually experiencing what they couldn’t appreciate in India. Realising the value of quality as the rational factor for a customer to confidently and repeatedly buy a brand,they’ve said,“Developed society is highly differentiated. Products are matched minutely to specific customer unstated needs. Their ecosystem is driven by quality that world-class products and technologies compete in.” Another comment was,“Pent-up demand is huge in India,and low price is the driving factor. Indian industrial development has accordingly been based on need,not experience or expression. Products are considered okay when they satisfy the basic intended purpose.”

Neither manufacturer nor employees easily understand or focus on the hidden rational quality. They call Mercedes,BMW,Louis Vuitton,Mont Blanc among others as costly lifestyle and status brands,but never ask how they’ve become so recognised globally. No education or training system has apprised them of the invention,innovation and sustaining quality guaranteed on the lifecycle of these products. I’ve never heard anyone here talk about the many trials,failures,tests and customer clinics these brands have undergone. They admire the brands only from visible glamorous advertisements.

That tells me that India’s cultural experience ignores the grid of quality excellence. In general,saris sell on weaving style and folkloric designs from different states. Sari shops give no guarantee on color as they say there’s no single,processed cleaning system. Consumers happily street-shop beautifully designed footwear at amazingly low prices. They don’t bother with quality,just design and color. In jewellery,weight of gold is the first check,next is design. Rarely do women focus on the clasp’s robustness which is intrinsic to quality. Will Indian brands sustain the future when global brands fiercely compete in India with sparkling quality,affordable price? My long European society experience has taught me the importance of hidden quality that’s their cultural phenomenon. On curious probing,I always got the answer that keeping historical records meticulously creates the grid of benchmarking with the best. It established that Mozart remains the master music composer of all time,whereas George Stephenson is respected for his invention of the steam locomotive,although that’s since been bettered with the world’s fastest train running at 302.8mph.

Advertisement

“It works well for me” is the functional factor of a customer delivery. Functionality is the prime criterion of a selling proposition. Human society development always happened with excellence of functional upliftment,e.g. from stone lithography copy to carbon copy to cyclostyling to photocopy to digital scan reproduction shows functional upliftment where better technology easily makes the old obsolete.

The key factor is rational,which I’ve found very difficult to make people here understand. Rational means non-visible quality support for emotive and functional attributes to sustain product longevity,e.g. in the hospitality industry,if a hotel uses sophisticated German sanitaryware but maintenance is poor,you have to close your nose to get rid of the stink. This totally bypasses the rational factor in the service industry,and mitigates the heavy spend on sanitaryware to look good.

I don’t believe people regularly buy a product or service based on emotion through its ad or sophisticated presentation. Customer believability for repeat purchase lies on “sparkling quality” that’s non-visible. Quality is the assurance of the product’s functionality during its lifecycle. So you need to define “QCW” (quality customer wants) specific to your brand.

Shombit Sengupta is an international creative business strategy consultant to top management. Reach him at http://www.shiningconsulting.com

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments