Premium

Opinion Demons and dark side

Debating Bollywood,Bengal and Iran

Saubhik Chakrabarti

June 20, 2009 12:53 AM IST First published on: Jun 20, 2009 at 12:53 AM IST

It was only after watching a bit of India TV’s coverage of the news story on the Bollywood actor and alleged sexual assault that I began to appreciate something I had heard earlier on news TV this week: the news anchor on CNN-IBN’s evening prime time bulletin,discussing the same story,repeatedly and emphatically making a point about ‘our inner demons’ and ‘our dark side’. Bollywood actors have inner demons and a dark side,the anchor and the guest agreed,and so do all of us. Yes. And when you watch India TV,even a bit of it,covering a story like this you know exactly where our inner demons and our dark side can lead us. But I don’t want to be unfair to CNN-IBN. Those observations would have been notable even without India TV’s unwitting aid to your correspondent. A two minute anchor-guest chat on humanity’s hidden unwholesome impulses in the course of an evening news bulletin is one of those things that make news TV what it is: full of surprises. One minute you are hearing chatter about BJP’s inner problems,the next minute it’s our inner demons.

Bengal’s,as it were,outer demons and its dark side deservedly got hours of news TV attention. Something was missing. CPM and Trinamul TV talking heads got away relatively lightly in their encounters with studio anchors of NDTV,CNN-IBN,Times Now. Saugata Ray’s start as a regular on the talk TV circuit should have seen him tested more. Sitaram Yechury and Nilotpal Basu never looked discomfited. Dinesh Trivedi put Times Now’s news anchor on the backfoot. This was not just because TV guests like Yechury are smart and experienced enough to dodge tough questions. It was primarily because there weren’t that many tough well-informed questions.

Advertisement

Yechury told NDTV that Maoists were receiving material help from Trinamul,as they did during Nandigram. May be. Or may not be. But irrespective of how Maoists are getting equipped in their war against the state,the question for Yechury and CPM should have been has CPM’s police in Bengal got any credibility left as a state agency. Is the police so sabotaged as an institution that CPM is afraid now that its intervention will look prejudiced even when the cause is right.

This was a point covered rather well in CNN-IBN’s debate on Lalgarh,with both the anchor and the non-party panelist pinning Nilotpal Basu down on the issue. But Basu got away with saying the area seeing all the violence has benefited from development. Moments like these need good backup research. Armed with that,anchors can make sharp,short,tough-to-answer interventions. Saugata Ray was never asked to answer yes/no to this question: will the Trinamul use the full might of the state against Maoists.

Even when you apparently have four news teams covering a story – Times Now told us it has put one team in Lalgarh,one team with the security force,one in Kolkata and one in Delhi — you can still not get a story as complicated as this if you don’t make a little effort to go beyond the obvious. In Times Now’s debate,the one featuring Dinesh Trivedi,the consensus was obtained that — bet you haven’t heard this before — we must condemn violence.

Advertisement

You don’t watch Indian news TV for Iran stories. But who knew Christian Amanpour and CNN in general could be so disappointing on this story. CNN’s reporting was ordinary and its analysis even more so. BBC beat CNN every time there was something to explain about a regime whose inner demons and dark side really do deserve lengthy mentions on prime time news bulletins.

saubhik.chakrabarti@expressindia.com

Curated For You
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express OpinionCongress decline is a story of centralisation, missed opportunities
X