Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Moscow: The British parliaments refusal to authorise a potential strike on Syria showed a growing understanding of the risks of military intervention in the conflict,Russian President Vladimir Putins senior foreign policy adviser said on Friday. People are beginning to understand how dangerous such scenarios are, Yuri Ushakov told reporters. He said he believed the vote on Thursday reflected the majority opinion in Europe as a whole,not just Britain. Reuters
Dont bomb chemical weapon sites: Experts
Washington: You simply cant safely bomb a chemical weapon storehouse into oblivion,experts say. Thats why the US is probably targeting something other than Syrias nerve agents. But now there is concern that bombing other sites could accidentally release dangerous chemical weapons as the US military lost track of some of the suspected nerve agents. Bombing stockpiles of chemical weapons would likely kill nearby civilians in an accidental nerve agent release,create a long-lasting environmental catastrophe or both,five experts said. ap
Models for possible intervention
Iraq,1991
US-led global military coalition; explicit mandate from UN Security Council to evict Iraqi forces from Kuwait
Balkans,1990s
US arms supplied to anti-Serb resistance in defiance of UN-mandated embargo; later US-led air campaign against Serb paramilitaries.
Somalia,1992-93
UN authorised international force for humanitarian reasons; US military involvement culminated in disaster and pullout.
Libya,2011
France and UK sought UN authorisation for humanitarian operation; air offensive continued until fall of Gaddafi.