Premium
This is an archive article published on July 21, 2009

Cantt do spirit

The Naxalite problem has clearly ballooned to alarming proportions,and now there is talk of creating new army cantonments deep...

The Naxalite problem has clearly ballooned to alarming proportions,and now there is talk of creating new army cantonments deep in the interior of affected states. While it makes sense to move your men where they are most needed,the question is: why are cantonments in India seen as such solid habitations?

Of all the British legacies that linger on in 21st-century India,this one has got to be one of the most interesting to explain. To map the cantonments that dot this country is to map in large part the political/ strategic geography of colonial times. This is a map which may not fox,say,Rudyard Kipling,were he to somehow reappear in our midst. But in an age when border defence as well as the internal security of India require greater agility,the solidity of our cantonments may be reviewed with good reason.

Perhaps it is finally time for a stock-taking of the relationship between cantonments and the armys actual operations,and how one affects the other. Certainly,the structures we see today might have made sense,once especially for a regime that needed to be watchful against the people it ruled. British garrisons were explicitly created to protect the factories,ships,offices and residences of the East India Company and,later,imperial interests in the days of the Great Game. Their location says it all erupting like blisters across north India after the 1857 war of independence,everywhere colonial power felt most besieged.

Independent India needs to start the conversation: is what we need a limber,mobile army,close to potential flashpoints? Or a force scattered across the country in deference to history and tradition?

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement