
One of the biggest talking points in Indian cricket over the past few years has been Rahul Dravid8217;s role as ODI wicketkeeper. Opinion has been divided, and Dravid has left the matter to the selectors though he has dropped broad hints on the need for change. However, the facts suggest that Dravid8217;s wicketkeeping is not only good for the team balance, it8217;s good for him as a cricketer.
The team management has never committed itself, or Dravid, to a permanent wicket-keeping slot; nor has it provided him more time with the gloves at the nets and at practice sessions. Worse, it set a time-frame till the end of World Cup 2003 to Dravid8217;s keeping.
It would be silly to conclude that 8217;keeping per se makes him a better batsman. But a logical corollary that 8217;keeping makes his place in the team more secure and him more relaxed is not too far-fetched. He knows today that as long as he keeps, his place in the team won8217;t be threatened. In fact, it is often looked at as a favour he does the team. Like most all-rounders, he has two areas to do well in. And being a disciplined and sincere cricketer, he has strived hard to excel in his roles.
In the current Indian set-up, Mohammed Kaif is the only batsman who can8217;t bowl. There isn8217;t space for one more, which would be the case if Dravid were to stop. That makes Dravid redundant for half the match. As a 8217;keeper and middle order bat, Dravid gets time to rest for at least 20-25 overs when India bats 8211; enough time for someone who has confessed his fitness has improved by leaps and bounds in recent times. The Indian team management under John Wright and Saurav Ganguly have made a number of hard decisions. One more needs to be made: forget Parthiv Patel currently averaging 12.50 and retain Dravid as batsman-keeper for the next few years.