Premium
This is an archive article published on September 17, 1998

Thackeray case adjourned

MUMBAI, SEPT 16: First class judicial magistrate, M H More, today adjourned the hearing of the defamation case filed by Opposition leader...

.

MUMBAI, SEPT 16: First class judicial magistrate, M H More, today adjourned the hearing of the defamation case filed by Opposition leader in the state Legislative Council, Chhagan Bhujbal, against Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray and two others, to November 16.

Bhujbal8217;s lawyer, Jayant Jaibhave, said none of the accused, Thackeray, Sanjay Raut and Subhash Desai editor, executive editor and publisher of the Sena mouthpiece, Saamna, respectively appeared in court today.

During previous hearings, the court had asked whether the complainant was prepared for reconciliatory proceedings. Bhujbal replied, saying he would withdraw the case if Thackeray publicly apologised and published his statements in newspapers. Thackeray, however, rejected the offer.

Bhujbal, who was present in court today, raised objections to the absenteeism of the accused and requested an early hearing. The magistrate adjourned the hearing to November 16.

Bhujbal had filed a defamation case against the trio on September 4, 1997,accusing them of publishing defamatory reports in Saamna dated July 23 and 24, 1997. The reports had accused Bhujbal of masterminding the desecration of a statue of Dr B R Ambedkar at Ramabai Nagar at Ghatkopar in Mumbai. The incident had sparked protests from local Dalits and the subsequent firing by the State Reserve Police Force resulted in the death of 11 Dalits on July 11, 1997.

The reports in Saamna were based on an affidavit filed by Rajendra Agarwal from Shahada Dhule, who claimed he was a close associate of Bhujbal. He had accused Bhujbal of instigating the statue8217;s desecration and even asked him to execute the deed, he claimed. Agarwal, however, says he refused.

According to Bhujbal, while other newspapers reported the contents of Agarwal8217;s affidavit, Saamna chose to provoke the Dalit community by projecting him as an enemy of the Dalits, alleging that he had indeed masterminded the desecration.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement