Premium
This is an archive article published on August 17, 1999

Technical man should replace Gill as selection committee chief’

NEW DELHI, AUG 16: Former Indian chief hockey coach, MK Kaushik, blasted the continued omission of six senior players from the National s...

.

NEW DELHI, AUG 16: Former Indian chief hockey coach, MK Kaushik, blasted the continued omission of six senior players from the National squad and charged the Indian Hockey Federation (IHF) with inducting players far inferior to them in the name of youth.

“The six players should continue to fightback…IHF will be forced to take them back. They’re much better than the youngsters,” Kaushik told PTI about the controversial omission of six top players led by mercurial forward Dhanraj Pillay.

Kaushik guided India to the Asian Games gold after a gap of 32 years at Bangkok in December last year, but was unceremoniously ousted alongwith Pillay, fellow forwards Mukesh Kumar and Sabu Varkey, half-back Sandeep Somesh and goalkeepers Ashish Ballal and AB Subbaiah.

Story continues below this ad

The Olympian severly criticised IHF president KPS Gill for his recent comments that none of the six, barring Pillay and Mukesh Kumar, will be considered for the Indian team and for saying that there was nothing to gloat about the Bangkokvictory.

“Gill will be advised to watch the video-cassettes of the matches. We beat South Korea in open play in the league stage before beating them on penalties in the final.

Kaushik, a key forward of the Indian team that won its eighth and last Olympic gold at Moscow in 1980, said he had incurred the wrath of the IHF officialdom for consistently supporting the senior players.

“I am always for the game. If they take the seniors (in the Indian team) and provide good results under another coach, still I will be a happy man,” he said.

Story continues below this ad

Kaushik demanded that Gill quit his post as chairman of the National selection committee and wanted a person with technical knowledge to take up the job to bring more fairness in team selection.

Denying there was any infighting among the players during the Asian Games campaign, Kaushik said there was “great team spirit”.

Kaushik supported IHF’s scheme to develop many teams, but felt below-par players were being accommodated to favour those close to the IHFbosses.

On Gill’s contention that the six seniors would not last till the Olympics next September, Kaushik said IHF’s argument not only lacked logic, but some of the replacements were actually older than those omitted.

Story continues below this ad

Asked whether money was the root cause for the rift between the star players and IHF, he said it was a major reason. He did not agree with Gill that IHF had to struggle to raise funds and that the players were unreasonable.

In fact, IHF was soft-pedalling on enaging a foreign coach or physical trainer as then they will decide on every aspect, including selection. “The compromise they are making now can work only at National, not at the international level,” he said.

Kaushik said it was fine to remove players, but only those who deserve should be selected and officials should also share the responsibility for poor performances.

Kaushik said he will write a book soon with special emphasis on the tumultuous six-month period he was National coach. “In that book, you will find manybehind-the-scenes events that people are not aware of,” he added.

IHF scuttled Dronacharya Award’

Story continues below this ad

MK Kaushik today said it appeared the IHF scuttled his chances of being bestowed with the Dronacharya Award for excellence in coaching.

“IHF appears to have had a hand in denying me the award. I don’t think I’ve done any wrong or harm to the federation or players,” said Kaushik, who was part of the 1980 Moscow Olympics gold medal winning squad and coach of the Bangkok Asian Games title-winning side last year.

“Apart from Bangkok, I have produced a number of women players who are in the National squad, including Pritam Rani besides working with some top men players,” Kaushik, who was the Chief women’s National coach before taking over the men’s team, said.

Kaushik spits venom

  • In my opinion, Dhanraj Pillay, Sabu Varkey, Mukesh Kumar and Ashish Ballal were the best in Bangkok Asiad. Varkey was even named best forward at the Murugappa Gold Cup tournament in Chennai recently, butIHF continues to ignore him. How can they justify such decisions?
  • They dropped Ballal, who is still the best goalkeeper in India. Edward Aloysious (who is with the Indian team now in South Africa) is older than Ballal and Jude Menezes (the second goalkeeper there) himself is around 28 years old. If IHF is serious about inducting fresh blood, it will pick those around 20-21 years old. So the argument to induct young blood is hollow.
  • Can the Board of Control for Cricket in India risk dropping someone like Sachin Tendulkar without incurring the wrath of the public? But the same is not true with our hockey and that is why IHF takes such (dictatorial) decisions.
  • When we do poorly, the coach resigns and players are changed. But will Gill, resign (as chairman of selectors) if the team does not do well? Selection is yours, blame is mine. How is this fair? Gill should not remain chairman of selectors. A technical man should head the committee.
  • If money is hard to come by, how does IHF sendabroad every time so many officials who have little knowledge of the game. Look at those who went for last year’s World Cup and Asian Games. In fact, the payment to players is even lower than the telephone bills of IHF.
  • Latest Comment
    Post Comment
    Read Comments
    Advertisement
    Advertisement
    Advertisement
    Advertisement