
Some of the recent events in high places have shown that the BJP was wise to moot the idea of a coordination committee for its coalition. Unfortunately, however, it has betrayed an alarming degree of uncoordination in its attempts at turning that idea into reality. So far, only two facts are known about this body: the identities of the chairman and the convenor, and even that seems to have been decided unilaterally and informally. The articles of association are yet to be decided upon. So far, it has managed to call only one meeting, with no declared agenda. And even that had to be called off for fear of a law and order problem developing in an enclosed space.
Ironically, this is precisely the time when a coordination committee would have been useful. Constituents have asked for the ouster of at least two state governments. Two ministers have been personally attacked by the lone, loud, surviving voice of the Janata Party. One of these has declared that a new life would be preferable to a lifetime ofblackmail. And he, again, has been told to shut up by three other ministers. On the sidelines, the Minister for Railways has started a campaign against the BJP8217;s Vananchal proposal, holding that the area has always been termed Jharkhand, and that the status quo ante ought to be maintained. But he, at least, has presented an issue, a rarity in a government whose internal differences appear to be completely personal. The lack of cohesiveness among members and the absence of coherence on agenda make its predecessor, which was widely disparaged as the handiwork of disreputable cobblers, look like an inexorably purposive monolith in comparison. And the sphinx-like silence of its Prime Minister puts to shame the reticence of his predecessor, who occasioned considerable mirth on this count. It is Prime Minister Vajpayee8217;s duty to manage the contradictions within his coalition. Failing that, he should constitute a body in which differences can be thrashed out before they break out into the public sphere.