
All this talk of Water offending 8220;the sensibility of the people8221; so violently, the UP government was compelled to ban its shoot, has got yours truly, well and truly thinking. The cultural commissars 8212; who object to everything from a film which deals with the lives of widows to a film which portrays Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi 8212; justify their violent objections on the grounds that these depictions offend the people8217;s sensibilities. If we extend their illogic to television, if we take into account all the TV programmes, channels, advertisements, we would discover enough downright offensive stuff to hurt the feelings of a steel girder. Well8230;
There will be an empty screen left after we have removed everything which offends, hurts people8217;s sensibilities. Except possibly, Krishi Darshan which assaults and offends our aesthetic sensibilities but aesthetics don8217;t count in the current offensive !.
To ask what is offensive on television begs the question, what is not? For example in no logical order:
And we8217;ve just begun. Someone hates World Wrestling Federation, another horror shows, a third detests TV violence/obscenity, a fourth has problems with Doordarshan which has become so irrelevant the crores spent on it, is a national shame8230;
You8217;ll say these examples are ridiculous and intentionally absurd. They are absurd. Just like the violent protests against the films. Should we ban, stop everything people8217;, some people don8217;t agree with? Haven8217;t we got anything better to do? Television offers one sensible the word is advisedly used alternative: exercise self-control. If something or someone offends your sensibilities, don8217;t watch. Switch to another channel, switch off. You achieve twin goals: you see and hear no evil so your sensibilities remain intact, pristine. More significantly, if viewership falls and protest letters come in, the show does not go on. This is a simplistic solution and tends to absolve channels, producers, advertisers of responsibility? Not entirely. The8220; people8217;s sensibilities8221; are their old friends, public reaction their best buddy. And self control is a beginning.
Laloo Prasad Yadav. Many people say they find him terribly offensive. People in Bihar didn8217;t necessarily agree: they voted for him beyond expectations. When he appeared triumphant on television, Friday night STAR News, he sent the opposition scurrying for cover. It was a great performance, an unforgettable television moment: one 8220;hain?8221; from him and Govindacharya BJP blanched. Yes he did. One invitation to tea, and Govindacharya swallowed as if his saliva had turned to poison. Brilliant.
DD News introduced a new set and its new TV anchors during the assembly election results. Mrinal Pande was good, Rahul Dev looked good but Sunit Tandon was uncomfortable, inadequate and looked both. He needs help like the Congress needs votes. And even then it might not be good enough. For years DD suited and booted people like him into newsreader8217;s clothes. Now it expects him to tandoori politicians and journos like chicken.
Next week: do we need elections, budgets, hijacks boring non-stop for ever on television?