Premium
This is an archive article published on July 2, 1999

Oh, Kolkata!

The revisionism game is on again. After Mumbai and Chennai, it is Calcutta's turn. Sorry, Kolkata's. New names take a while to sink in. P...

.

The revisionism game is on again. After Mumbai and Chennai, it is Calcutta8217;s turn. Sorry, Kolkata8217;s. New names take a while to sink in. Poor Kolkata, still one of India8217;s most liberal and cosmopolitan cities, peopled by half a dozen nationalities from the Chinese to the Armenians, a salad bowl spanning the peoples of a whole continent, is going to get an exclusivistic Bengali name. Its people will suffer quot;social boycottquot; if they do not teach their children Bengali.

They will be denied jobs if they don8217;t know the language themselves. This is revisionistic ethnic pride in the last refuge of communist internationalism in the world. The methods proposed, the values espoused, the idiom of this project in social engineering are those peculiar to the most virulent strains of the right.

Or to Maoists, the very people that the moderate left that is now in power helped to exterminate in the Naxalite years. quot;Let Kolkata remain a cosmopolitan city,quot; says Sunil Gangopadhyay, litterateur and prime saviour of Bengaliand Bengaliana. But we will not allow people to forget that this is also the capital of Pashchim Banga.quot; It would be difficult to ignore a sizeable inner contradiction so dear to Calcutta8217;s Marxists in that statement, as bloated as an inner tube.

Of course, it is all done in righteous good faith. In recent times, Calcutta8217;s ethic has deteriorated and to some extent the young, rich scions of immigrant families have been responsible. Also, like Mumbai, Calcutta has special problems with its past 8212; it was created, almost ex nihilo, by the British. If we are to be atavistic, the oldest name is the most authentic.

Calcutta8217;s name should therefore be changed to Sutanuti, the first village that Job Charnock8217;s arrack-addled attention settled on in the region that was to become Calcutta. Doesn8217;t ring too many bells, does it? That is the trouble with going back in time. Antiquity tends to be remote. And can the city8217;s ethic be improved by thrusting Bankim Chandra and Sarat Chandra down the throats ofrecalcitrant Marwaris and Biharis? One can visualise less dramatic methods. A better police force, for one. A political cadre that does not control every aspect of the citizen8217;s life, for another. Simple methods. Methods which will never be used, because there is no political percentage in them.

Bengalis have always been accused of a degree of cultural chauvinism. For them, a difficulty with their language is a bit like aphasia; a lack of acquaintance with Tagore8217;s works a bit like illiteracy. There is some truth in the charge, but only with respect to the elite Bengalis of Calcutta.

Similarly, the current paroxysm about language and place names is afflicting Calcutta, not Bengal. It was ideological Calcutta that dictated that Bengal8217;s children would be educated in the mother tongue in their tenderest years. It was rural Bengal, tired of having its children spurned by the job market, that forced Calcutta to bring English back on the primary education menu. Now, Calcutta8217;s cultural and political elite aretrying to force subnationalism upon an essentially cosmopolitan city and a liberal people.

Story continues below this ad

We can only hope that the rest of Bengal will rise once again to the occasion. Pardon, dread lords. We meant Pashchim Banga, of course, not Bengal.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement