Premium
This is an archive article published on May 28, 2006

Finetune prescription

Hasty solutions to the quota conundrum will destroy a chance to overhaul the system of higher education

.

The UPA government8217;s response to the OBC quota conundrum is both right and wrong. Right, in that the approach of seeking to expand the reach and scope of higher education is wholly to be welcomed and would go a long way in assuaging the misgivings of the protesters. Wrong, in that it betrays a misplaced element of haste. An initiative as important and far-reaching as this, which could be a blueprint for the future, requires deliberation and due process. It cannot be an arrangement cobbled together quickly by a handful of bureaucrats in a back room.

If there are no free lunches, there are no silver bullets either. The government must remember it is no Gogia Pasha, producing six new

AIIMS by 2008 out of thin air, or doubling the MBBS seats by the same year. Ditto for IIM and IIT seats. It is not that such extraordinary expansion cannot be done. But doing it in a slapdash manner would saddle the country with innumerable half-baked institutions from which it cannot benefit in real terms. We need to expand our institutions of higher learning in a manner that can guarantee the highest standards. This would require the involvement of our best minds in the field of education and other disciplines, not just the bureaucrats of the HRD ministry. It also demands huge investments. This is where private sector involvement comes in8212;we need to liberalise higher education, just as we had liberalised the economy 15 years ago. One of the reasons why the higher education sector finds itself out of limb today is because of the failure to involve the private sector meaningfully in it. Take America8217;s most prestigious educational institutions. They acquired their world class status largely due to corporate funding and private endowments. There is no reason why our captains of industry should not rise to the challenge of changing the face of higher education. They, after all, benefit directly from the process, not just because higher education is a lucrative proposition, but because it makes for better professionals and more aware consumers.

We would also counsel agitating students to calm down. Hysteria is no solution. Student leaders have the responsibility to come out unequivocally against extreme actions like attempted self-immolation. If they don8217;t do this, they would be betraying themselves, the student community and the cause for which they are supposedly fighting.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement