
THE examining room at the Directorate of Forensic Sciences in Gandhinagar is not what I imagined it would be. It8217;s spartan, painted all green the colour is apparently soothing and there8217;s a couch placed next to the see-all, know-all machine.
I8217;m certainly not prepared to answer prying questions. Have you ever felt like murdering your boss? Ever cheated in a relationship? I8217;m sitting on the couch and there are wires connecting my two left fingers with the lie detector. Would I be able to outwit the machine? Would I pass the polygraph test? The suspense is mounting.
My opponent8217;s a formidable gizmo, one who8217;s seen through every kind of deception several accused from across the country are brought here. Gutkha barons Manikchand Dhariwal and JM Joshi were grilled about their alleged links with the underworld at the lab.
The lie detector, which looks like a poor man8217;s DJ console, with various buttons, and four small plastic ink bottles, has also seen suspicious beaus one got her boyfriend tested to find out if he8217;d strayed, and even a Nandurbar-based doctor who allegedly 8216;8216;injected his wife with the HIV virus8217;8217;.
Director JM Vyas explains that the polygraph machine works on some very basic principles: 8216;8216;Our consciousness is Satchitanand and accepts only what is true. It does accept the false, but doing so causes physiological changes over which we have no control.8217;8217;
Technically, what the machine does is monitor the pulse, blood pressure and even perspiration levels, which alter with every action and reaction.
The scientists maintain a large database of changes in heart rate, etc, on dummy questions and on case-specific questions. From the variations in the response, and from what they know of normal responses, they are able to determine if a person is lying or not. However, lie-detector results do not amount to evidence in court and are only accepted as investigative tools.
The time for my test arrives. Turns out they8217;re not interested in my private life. It8217;s going to be a simple card-based test. I8217;m handed five chits of paper and instructed by a scientific officer to number them from one to five.
There8217;s another small piece of paper, which I8217;m supposed to keep with myself after writing down any number from one to five. The officer then asks me to be calm and instructs me to reply in the negative to all the questions that will be directed to me. The Art of Lying begins. 8216;8216;Do you have number four?8217;8217; 8216;8216;No8217;8217;. The questions that follow are all blocked with 8216;No8217; from my end. The polygraph machine is on the job and steadily registers my pulse on a graph paper.
Is it number five, asks the officer8212;8216;No8217; again. The same set of questions are repeated. A little later, as the the officer declares the test over, I think I stand a chance.
Five minutes later, an expert is scrutinising the graph sheet. 8216;8216;The number on your chit is five,8217;8217; she tells me. It is indeed, and I8217;m stunned. Vyas shows me the printout, which has the readings of my BP, pulse rate and other reactions. At certain points, my blood pressure and pulse rate had indeed risen and the rise corresponded to my untruthful moments. I bow to the machine, turn around and make a hasty exit.