📣 For more lifestyle news, click here to join our WhatsApp Channel and also follow us on Instagram

Married for over 18 years, Akshay Kumar and Twinkle Khanna have long been considered one of Bollywood’s most adored couples. While Akshay is known for his discipline, fitness, and action-packed career, Twinkle is equally celebrated for her sharp wit and candid nature.
The two tied the knot on January 7, 2001, in an intimate ceremony attended by close friends and family, and the news of their wedding only became public much later. What many didn’t know until years later, however, was that Twinkle had taken an unusually pragmatic approach before saying “yes” to Akshay.
While the revelation left Karan Johar and Akshay Kumar laughing, the Kesari actor admitted that he only found out about it after their wedding. Initially annoyed, he later realised that Twinkle had a valid point. But did Akshay’s family pass her test? Twinkle answered in her signature style, “They did pass my litmus test. Most of them are still alive because they have healthy genes!”
This brings up an interesting question — should people really be factoring genetics into their decision to get married? We asked an expert to weigh in.
According to Bhakti Joshi, counselling psychologist, Samarpan Health (Consultant), “The concept of verifying a potential partner’s background — whether medical, behavioural, or character-wise — has long been a part of Indian society, especially in arranged marriages. Traditionally, these background checks were done through astrology, auspicious timings (muhurats), marriage mediators, and informal inquiries. Over time, this evolved into more structured approaches, such as agencies and direct background verifications.”
In recent years, she states that there has been an increasing focus on a partner’s family medical history, particularly hereditary or genetic conditions, due to their potential impact on future offspring. While this approach reflects a growing awareness of health-related concerns, it is important to navigate such inquiries with sensitivity and mutual consent.
“As a psychologist working with couples and families, I have observed a general lack of awareness about genetics and biology. This lack of psychoeducation can sometimes amplify pre-existing anxieties in the search for an ‘ideal’ partner,” reveals Joshi.
Interestingly, she says that societal expectations often “place the responsibility of having a healthy child primarily on women, leading to a shift in ideology post-marriage and pregnancy.” Educating individuals and families about genetic factors — such as recessive disorders, family history, and carrier status — can help alleviate anxiety. However, it is crucial that such discussions take place with mutual consent and without reinforcing fears or unrealistic expectations.
The term “genetic investment” is open to individual interpretation. “What matters most is ensuring that both partners have the right to information — with consent — and that discussions about medical history happen through open, non-judgmental communication,” notes Joshi.