Waqf amendments rushed through … BJP saw it was losing Delhi: Congress Lok Sabha whip Mohammad Jawed
The most upsetting thing is that they have spread the misconception among masses that anyone can claim any piece of land as Waqf and it is declared a Waqf property, said Dr Mohammad Jawed.
New Delhi | Updated: January 29, 2025 02:36 PM IST
4 min read
Whatsapp
twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Dr Mohammad Jawed at the meeting by the Joint Parliamentary Committee on the Waqf Bill on Monday. (x/@DrMdJawaid1)
Two days after approving 14 amendments proposed by MPs of the BJP and its allies, and rejecting all 44 suggested by the Opposition, the Joint Committee of Parliament on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024 will hold its last meeting on Wednesday, with its report likely to be tabled in Parliament in the Budget Session from January 31 to February 13. Panel member and the Congress whip in Lok Sabha, Dr Mohammad Jawed, says why he thinks the committee’s proceedings so far have been eyewash.
Excerpts:
How do you see the committee’s proceedings so far?
A farce, an eyewash. It’s a big joke on the people of India. That is all I will say.
The Opposition’s 44 proposed amendments were not accepted. What were the suggestions?
The whole system was unparliamentary. The norms and formalities as per written procedure weren’t followed. You (referring to panel Chairman, BJP’s Jagdambika Pal) called us abruptly (for Monday’s meeting, when the amendments were approved). The most important thing is that the Chairman is saying 36 meetings were held. In these meetings, almost 90 per cent of the people who came to depose opposed almost all the amendments. The 5-10 per cent who agreed with the changes had nothing to do with Waqf. They also included Waqf land encroachers.
The most upsetting thing is that they have spread the misconception among masses that anyone can claim any piece of land as Waqf and it is declared a Waqf property. This is a blatant lie. Those who came to depose before the committee were asked questions, and a majority of them couldn’t reply in writing. These answers should have been shared with members, which didn’t happen.
This month, there were study tours in Lucknow, Kolkata and Patna. We met several stakeholders in these states and asked them questions. They weren’t given time to send their answers and suddenly voting was done on the amendments.
You are suggesting that after the study tour to these three cities, there was a rush to push the NDA members’ amendments. Why do you think it was done?
It is unfortunate that the people of this country have elected a prime minister who only has an eye on elections. He has no concern for the country’s functioning. They saw that they were losing the Delhi elections, and hence, rushed the process for electoral gains in Delhi. The extension granted to us by the Speaker (Om Birla) was until the last week of the Budget Session.
This is an attack on the social fabric of the country. This is an attack on the safeguards given to minorities by the Constitution, and we will go to the Supreme Court… and we are preparing for that too.
Story continues below this ad
If the Bill is passed in Parliament, what will the Opposition’s next step be?
What happened yesterday… Nitish Kumar’s JD(U), Chirag Paswan’s LJP (RV) and TDP. These parties claim to be pro-minorities and win with votes from minorities. They mislead people by saying they will oppose the Bill. But they have supported the Government on the Bill and when it is tabled in Parliament, then the country will see the truth.
The parties you have named above are NDA allies and had raised questions on the Bill when it was introduced in August. What do you think happened that they and the BJP are now on the same page?
I can’t say for sure. But maybe they were threatened by agencies like ED, etc. Or maybe they don’t do what they say.
Is the Opposition preparing to approach the courts if the Bill is passed?
The kind of legislation they are trying to pass, it will result in tension in all areas. This will not be confined to the Muslim community but eventually similar things will happen with Christian, Sikh, Jain and Buddhist communities as well as the majority community.
Asad Rehman is with the national bureau of The Indian Express and covers politics and policy focusing on religious minorities in India. A journalist for over eight years, Rehman moved to this role after covering Uttar Pradesh for five years for The Indian Express.
During his time in Uttar Pradesh, he covered politics, crime, health, and human rights among other issues. He did extensive ground reports and covered the protests against the new citizenship law during which many were killed in the state.
During the Covid pandemic, he did extensive ground reporting on the migration of workers from the metropolitan cities to villages in Uttar Pradesh. He has also covered some landmark litigations, including the Babri Masjid-Ram temple case and the ongoing Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath temple dispute.
Prior to that, he worked on The Indian Express national desk for three years where he was a copy editor.
Rehman studied at La Martiniere, Lucknow and then went on to do a bachelor's degree in History from Ramjas College, Delhi University. He also has a Masters degree from the AJK Mass Communication Research Centre, Jamia Millia Islamia. ... Read More