Premium
This is an archive article published on September 6, 2022

Arshdeep Singh’s page vandalised, here’s why govt summoned Wikimedia executives

The Indian government has summoned executives of the Wikimedia Foundation, the organisation that runs Wikipedia, after cricketer Arshdeep Singh's page was vandalised. What are its concerns? How are edits made? How has Wikipedia reacted?

Key details on Arshdeep Singh’s Wikipedia page about his nationality were edited with references to ‘Khalistan’. (Twitter/BCCI)Key details on Arshdeep Singh’s Wikipedia page about his nationality were edited with references to ‘Khalistan’. (Twitter/BCCI)

The Ministry of Electronics and IT (MeitY) has summoned executives of the Wikimedia Foundation, the organisation that runs Wikipedia, seeking an explanation on how the Wikipedia page of Indian cricketer Arshdeep Singh was vandalised Sunday night after he dropped a crucial catch during a Asia Cup match that India eventually lost against Pakistan.

Key details on Singh’s Wikipedia page about his nationality were edited with references to ‘Khalistan’. The cricketer was also subjected to vicious trolling on social media after he dropped the catch in the 18th over of the match.

What are MeitY’s concerns?

Story continues below this ad

Senior government officials said that the edits could potentially lead to national security issues for the country and have implications of law and order. They said that the edits were made using networks that originated from neighbouring countries.

“We will ask them how such edits could be allowed to stay on their site which could have serious implications for India’s national security and law and order in the country,” a senior government official said.

A review of the edits on the cricketer’s Wikipedia page shows that the first edits with reference to ‘Khalistan’ were made by a user using the Internet on the network of Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL), the country’s state-owned telecom company.

Reacting to the incident, Minister of State for Electronics and IT Rajeev Chandrashekhar tweeted, “No intermediary operating in India can permit this type of misinformation and deliberate efforts to incitement and user harm — it violates our government’s expectation of a safe & trusted Internet”.

Story continues below this ad

How do edits on Wikipedia work?

Wikipedia pages are written and edited by volunteers, and when someone makes an edit on a certain page, the task can not be completed until the user either logs in or completes the task anonymously. In case a user logs in to make an edit, the edit history of a page shows their username along with the edit they have made. If a user makes an edit anonymously, the platform records their IP address.

Anyone can make an edit on a Wikipedia page and changes are typically visible to everyone. However, there are certain safeguards. Wikipedia has page histories, so along with the latest version, the previous version will exist too, available to both readers and editors. Wikipedia editors monitor what is happening across the site on a page that lists all the most recent changes, and they will revert to the older version if the latest change is erroneous or malicious. The website also uses bots to weed out wrong or misleading information.

How has Wikipedia reacted to the incident?

Story continues below this ad

Acknowledging that the Ministry has sought answers about the vandalism, a spokesperson for Wikimedia Foundation said that the wrongful edits made on Singh’s page were “removed within minutes by Wikipedia’s volunteer community”. “Right now, the article on English Wikipedia is semi-protected (which allows edits by only trusted users) to restrict further vandalism on the page.”

“Vandalism does occur on Wikipedia from time to time, as can occur in any open, online platform. It is a violation of the trust and good faith of our editors and readers, and runs contrary to the values on which Wikipedia is based. The majority of vandalism on Wikipedia is reverted by bots or editors within minutes, as was done in this recent case,” the spokesperson added.

Soumyarendra Barik is Special Correspondent with The Indian Express and reports on the intersection of technology, policy and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he has reported on issues of gig workers’ rights, privacy, India’s prevalent digital divide and a range of other policy interventions that impact big tech companies. He once also tailed a food delivery worker for over 12 hours to quantify the amount of money they make, and the pain they go through while doing so. In his free time, he likes to nerd about watches, Formula 1 and football. ... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement