This is an archive article published on June 24, 2020
State cannot permit conduct of pending ICSE exams in July: Maharashtra govt tells HC
When asked about conducting the pending Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), state government submitted that it can address the issue as and when the CBSE approaches it
The class 10 exams was scheduled from July 2 to 12, and class 12 exams from July 1 to 14. Representational image/ file
The Maharashtra government told the Bombay High Court on Wednesday that it was decided in a state Disaster Management Committee meeting held on June 22 through video-conferencing under the chairmanship of Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray that state cannot permit the conduct of pending ICSE ( Indian Certification of Secondary Education) exams to be held from July 2 in view of Covid-19 situation in the state.
Moreover, when asked about conducting the pending Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), state government submitted that it did not address the issue since the petition was pertaining to ICSE exams, however, it can address the issue as and when the CBSE approaches it. Advocate General Kumbhakoni said that the state had consistently maintained a position that it was principally against conducting exams in view of pandemic.
AG Kumbhakoni told the Court that the decision was conveyed to him by Vandana Krishna, Additional Chief Secretary, on June 23, stating the direction was passed not to conduct physical exams for pending ICSE papers. A similar decision was taken for not conducting the University exams, the communication said.
This comes after the HC while expressing concerns over rising Covid-19 cases in the state had sought to know if it was adopting a “wait and watch” policy and had asked the state government to “clear” its position on holding physical examination for pending class X and XII papers of the Council for Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE).
The Maharashtra government had last week informed the HC that it has the power and authority to regulate and, if necessary, completely prevent the conduct of CISCE board exams of pending papers in view of COVID-19 pandemic. Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni had said depending on how many students opt to actually appear for the physical exams, it will be able to take a final decision.
A division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice SS Shinde heard, through video-conference, a plea by advocate Arvind Rangnarain Tiwari, also the parent of a student from an ICSE-affiliated school, who had sought a court direction to the authorities to cancel the rescheduled exams in view of the pandemic and declare results on the basis of past performance in the papers for which exams have not been held yet. The HC also heard intervention pleas by parents.
The CISCE on June 15 had told the HC that it will not force students to appear for the remaining exams for classes X and XII in July and that it had decided to offer students two options — they can appear for the remaining papers as per the revised schedule or they could opt-out, in which case the final results will be based on their performance in internal assessment or pre-board exams.
The court had also asked the central government to inform it about the decision of the Home Ministry, if any, pertaining to a plea before the Allahabad High Court, seeking cancellation of pending CISCE and CBSE exams.
Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh on Wednesday said that the Supreme Court was seized of a plea pertaining to CBSE exam and the top Court will be informed about the decision and the same can be conveyed to the HC.
When the bench inquired with the Council about the methodology for alternate assessment will be finalised by Thursday, June 25, the lawyer for the Board said that it is awaiting the SC decision and the methodology can be accordingly finalised.
Story continues below this ad
Moreover, the Court said that since the state has taken a decision, the Council would have to abide by it and the schools cannot force students to choose between two options. Moreover, when the query was raised about the situation in case the other states allow conducting exams, the bench said that the Council can consider alternatives such as making arrangements for willing students in Maharashtra to give physical exams in adjoining states with due precautions and safety. However, it said that such queries can be heard later during the next hearing along with the methodology and posted the matter to Monday, June 29.
Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions.
Expertise & Authority
Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage.
Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in:
Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include:
Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes).
Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty).
Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict.
Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability.
Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges.
Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More