Premium
This is an archive article published on July 26, 2016

So what if Jallikattu is an ‘age-old tradition’, child marriage was too: Supreme Court to Tamil Nadu

The Supreme Court observed that mere presence of tradition cannot justify organising Jallikattu in Tamil Nadu.

jallikattu, jallikattu ban, supreme court jallikattu, jallikattu ban supreme court, supreme court jallikattu The Supreme Court observed that mere presence of tradition cannot justify organising Jallikattu in Tamil Nadu. (file photo)

Countering Tamil Nadu’s interpretation of Jallikattu as an ‘age-old tradition’ which is practiced far and wide in the state, the Supreme Court in a sharp remark said child marriage was also once an ‘age-old tradition’ before being banned.

Rubbishing the state’s plea that Jallikattu should be allowed because it is a centuries old tradition, the top court said, “Child marriage too is an age old tradition. Does that make it legal? In earlier times child marriage was common. Does that justify its practice?”

The Bench responded that it would consider the plea for a larger Bench after hearing preliminary arguments on constitutionality of the January notification. The matter is posted for its final disposal till August 23.

Story continues below this ad

The Apex court also observed that mere presence of tradition cannot justify its practice.

Jallikattu means “bull-taming,” and bulls are let loose as young men compete to subdue them. The sport, usually held in the “Pongal” season in February to celebrate the winter harvest, was not held this year with the court intervening just five days after the centre lifted the ban imposed by the previous Congress-led government.

Tamil Nadu, however, contended why Jallikattu is illegal when bull-fighting, where the animal is killed, has been given constitutional protection as part of cultural heritage.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement