Air India 'urination' case: Shankar Mishra is accused of 'outraging the modesty of a woman', which is a punishable offence and can lead to either a jail term of up to five years or a fine or both.
As Vice President Dhankar rekindled the debate over the “Basic Structure” doctrine, we take a look at Kesavananda Bharati, the man whose court case resulted in the the Supreme Court’s landmark verdict regarding it
The two were arrested for consuming beer on a domestic flight and creating a ruckus on the aircraft. What exactly is the law about drinking on flights? Are the rules different for domestic and international flights? We explain.
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar criticised the Supreme Court for using the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down constitutional amendments by Parliament, such as the NJAC Act. What is the Doctrine of Basic Structure of the Indian Constitution?
Earlier, all under the age of 18 were considered minors, but through an amendment in 2015, a provision was added to the JJ Act for trying a child in conflict with the law as an adult in certain cases.
Under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Sections 292, 293 and 294 along with Section 67 of the Information Technology Act deal with the offence of obscenity. How have these been interpreted? We explain.
Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud has transferred to the Supreme Court a batch of petitions seeking recognition of same-sex marriages in India
On December 20 last year, the Uttarakhand High Court directed the Railways to evict those living in Haldwani’s Gafoor Basti, land adjoining the Haldwani railway station.
The Supreme Court identified six issues in the challenge to the government’s demonetisation decision. Both the majority judgment and the dissent gave their views on each of these issues. We explain.
Justice Nagarathna referred to records submitted by the Union government and the RBI to conclude that the central bank did not apply its mind independently while recommending demonetisation as proposed by the Centre.
Bilkis Bano's petition challenged the apex court’s May order that permitted the Gujarat government to decide on the remission of the 11 convicts who gangraped her and murdered seven members of her family during the 2002 Godhra riots.
What are the two systems for the appointment of judges, and what triggered the fresh debate? We explain.
Law Minister Kiren Rijiju has said people feel that long vacations taken by courts is inconvenient for those seeking justice. How long are court vacations in India — and what are the arguments for and against judges taking breaks? What happens in other countries?
What is the plea that the SC is hearing? What is the rule for political parties' symbols? We explain.
The online RTI portal has been initiated to make it convenient for people to access information about the Supreme Court. So far, RTI applications at the Supreme Court had to be filed only via post.
A five-judge Constitution Bench led by Justice K M Joseph is hearing petitions seeking a Collegium-type body to appoint Election Commissioners (ECs) and the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC). What is the procedure?
The purpose of the law was to prevent or discourage forcible or fraudulent religious conversions with the promise of marriage, something that Hindutva groups often refer to as “love jihad”.
A decade after the law’s enactment, a nationwide study throws light on high acquittal rates and the pendency of cases.
The Supreme Court's decision in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case is final, but the Constitution does allow scope for a review. Reviews are, however, not usually admitted — and overturning a verdict in a review is rare.
In one case, advocate C Emalias, who was recommended for the Madras HC, had his name dropped as the delay in appointment saw him cross the age of 55.
Challenges to the Places of Worship Act,1991 have been posed through petitions filed by many people, including former BJP MP Subramanian Swamy and advocate Ashwini Upadhyay.
The 103rd amendment delinked the need for class-based reservations from “inadequacy of representation” and the “need to show backwardness”, and provided guardrails to reservations connected with poverty by allowing a 10 per cent quota based on income criteria of individuals.
Apurva Vishwanath breaks down the contents of the four separate judgments into the key issues they addressed
The 103rd Amendment inserted Articles 15(6) and 16(6) in the Constitution to provide up to 10 per cent reservation to the economically weaker sections (EWS) among non-OBC and non-SC/ST sections of the population.
Calling the amendment “an attack on the constitutional vision of social justice” and “a fraud on the Constitution”, those petitioning against it contend that if upheld, it will be the end of equality of opportunity.




