Premium

Why Union minister Giriraj Singh’s proposed yatra has made ally JD(U) ‘uncomfortable’

Nitish Kumar’s party reiterates that its govt stands for communal harmony as the yet-to-be announced Hindu Swabhiman Yatra is likely to traverse through areas of Seemanchal, which have a significant Muslim population

Union Minister Giriraj Singh. (Photo: Giriraj Singh/ X)Union Minister Giriraj Singh. (Photo: Giriraj Singh/ X)

After disagreements with ally BJP over the waqf Bill and a now-backtracked scheme facilitating lateral entry into bureaucracy, the latest emerging flashpoint between the Nitish Kumar-led JD(U) and its coalition partner seems to be Union Minister and Begusarai MP Giriraj Singh’s proposed ‘Hindu Swabhiman Yatra’.

JD(U) MLCs Ghulam Gous and Neeraj Kumar, in an apparent reference to the “divisive” nature of the yatra, have reiterated that their government has always stood for communal harmony. “Nitish Kumar has worked for fencing temples with the same zeal that he has worked for fencing cemeteries. Our government stands for religious camaraderie,” Neeraj said.

Though the yatra is yet to be officially announced, sources told The Indian Express that it is likely to commence on October 18 in Bhagalpur and traverse through Kishanganj, Purnia, Araria and Katihar – areas in Seemanchal with a significant Muslim population – before concluding on October 22.

Story continues below this ad

The NDA had lost Purnia, Katihar and Kishanganj in the recent Lok Sabha elections while retaining the Araria seat. While Independent Pappu Yadav defeated the JD(U)’s Santosh Kumar Kushwaha in Purnia, the Congress’s Tariq Anwar defeated the JD(U)’s Dular Chandra Goswami in Katihar. In Kishanganj, JD(U) leader Mujahid Alam was defeated by Congress nominee Mohammad Jawed.

The Opposition too has slammed the proposed yatra, saying the idea is “fraught with apprehensions of causing communal discord”. “He (Singh) is a Union minister who has taken oath on the Constitution, which does not allow anyone to speak divisively on religious lines. Such a minister should be dropped for the very idea of carrying out such a yatra,” RJD national spokesperson Subodh Kumar Mehta told The Indian Express.

Echoing Mehta’s views, senior Congress leader Prem Chandra Mishra wondered how Hindu pride could be at stake when a NDA government was helming the state and said Singh must be stopped from undertaking the yatra.

The Union minister, who is known for his aggressive stance, seemed unmoved and defended his idea. “I wonder why some people have issues with me undertaking a yatra. When (RJD leader) Tejashwi Yadav held a yatra, no one complained. No one opposed when (Jan Suraaj Party founder) Prashant Kishor held a yatra. I have said it several times that Hindus need to be united. Batoge toh katoge (divided we will fall),” he recently told reporters.

Story continues below this ad

The BJP claimed Singh is working on a “social cause” and his yatra will not hurt anyone. “Singh has raised the issue of how Hindus in Purvanchal are low on confidence and there is a need to invoke a sense of pride in them. He is also focused on the Seemanchal belt where Hindus are either in a minority (Kishanganj) or feel threatened,” party spokesperson Manoj Sharma said.

Santosh Singh is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express since June 2008. He covers Bihar with main focus on politics, society and governance. Investigative and explanatory stories are also his forte. Singh has 25 years of experience in print journalism covering Bihar, Delhi, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka.   ... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement