Premium
This is an archive article published on August 18, 2010
Premium

Opinion Futile activities

The argument that Delhi’s failure to control Kashmir and its Pakistan relationship will bring in the rest of the world is partially correct.

The Indian Express

August 18, 2010 12:03 AM IST First published on: Aug 18, 2010 at 12:03 AM IST

This refers to C. Raja Mohan’s ‘Masterful activity’ (IE,August 16). The argument that Delhi’s failure to control Kashmir and its Pakistan relationship will bring in the rest of the world is partially correct. When India’s weak,it lends itself to being dictated to. But does Pakistan,a country on the verge of collapse,care about what America says? There’s also the claim that a “restive” Kashmir will bring greater international support for Pakistan’s army — that the road to Kabul must run through Srinagar. If such a situation develops,the Indian PM would do well to show a thick skin.

The article also says that “Dr Singh cannot allow the intelligence agencies and the army a separate veto each over political and strategic decisions”. Veto or no veto,he would be well advised to allow the defence ministry,army and CRPF to decide whatever is necessary. While “masterly inactivity” is also a strategy,it appears that under the present circumstances,it’s the only option available till the futility of this present phase of “azaadi” protests becomes crystal clear.

— B.V. Shenoy

Bangalore

Sound bits

Advertisement

Shekhar Gupta’s Walk the Talk with CEC S.Y. Quraishi (IE,August 17) offers a lot of information to ordinary citizens. It’s heartening to note that the CEC is seized of the issue of black money,booth capturing,criminal antecedents of some candidates,etc. Unfortunately,the political-cum-electoral landscape is disfigured with these aberrations and evils. EVMs and other devices have tightened the screw as far as systemic fairness is concerned. The judiciary has come to the rescue of the EC time and again. But more needs to be done.

— John Alexander

Nagpur

Delhi’s failure

When Omar Abdullah took over as J&K chief minister,expectations were high. When we look at him now,we notice that he failed to decentralise power. He must decentralise and democratise before he turns into an autocrat. So much could be initiated if he does that. Abdullah himself calls his performance a “mixed bag”,and tacitly acknowledges the importance of having New Delhi on his side. He enjoys a clean image. Yet he’s widely seen as having failed in his first year. But has Abdullah failed or was he failed by what’s become of Kashmir,something many describe as a repository for much that’s wrong with India as a nation? Given Kashmir’s importance,no CM faces the constraints of a J&K CM. In fact,Abdullah’s failure is only a part of New Delhi’s continuing failure in Kashmir.

— Md. Ziyaullah Khan

Nagpur

Losing the shoe

The worldwide attention an Iraqi journalist got for hurling his shoe at George Bush can’t be equalled. It’s already stale and doesn’t convey the intended message satisfactorily; the shoe-thrower just loses his pair!

— S. Rajagopalan

Chennai

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments