Premium

Opinion Winning Serb

Does Djokovic’s amazing streak make him the best?

June 2, 2011 03:40 AM IST First published on: Jun 2, 2011 at 03:40 AM IST

A couple of weeks after Apollo 11’s lunar odyssey in 1969,a shy Australian achieved the moon,so to speak. Wielding his wooden racquet,wristy Rod Laver conquered New York,and the world watched in awe as the 30-year-old navigated tennis gloriously through uncharted territory — the Open era. By winning all four majors in a year for the second time (he had won a Grand Slam in the pre-Open 1962),Laver was bestowed with the title of the greatest tennis player ever. To this day,he is worshipped by his most worthy successors. Pete Sampras modelled his game on him; Roger Federer cannot maintain a dry eye in Laver’s presence; Rafael Nadal stopped singing lavish praises of his Swiss arch-rival after uncle Toni narrated heroic tales of Laver on a flight to Melbourne.

That’s what it once took to be the best in the business — revered by colleagues,adored by fans and worthy of feats unachievable by the rest of mankind. Today,public perception has perhaps made it a lot easier. The title now rests with a man whose claim to fame is being on the verge of equalling an outlandishly long streak,set over a quarter-century ago.

Advertisement

There’s no doubt Novak Djokovic is playing better tennis than he has in his entire career,and possibly the best tennis this year has witnessed. But to claim he is playing better than anybody in the history of the game is plain wrong. Even if the 24-year-old has done what few in the history could by winning 43 matches on the trot,and 41 this calendar year. For streaks are freaks — it cannot be prepared for,the way one could for a Grand Slam.

Without taking any credit away from the Serb,it will be interesting to see how he will be perceived once the anomaly comes to an end. One burst of rhythm,like in Djokovic’s case,is at best a stepping stone to the pinnacles that the likes of Federer and Nadal have achieved.

John McEnroe’s 1984 run of 42 unbeaten matches in a year and Guillermo Vilas’s 46-match streak on all surfaces in 1977 are under threat. But does that make it better than when Federer was unbeaten for 65 matches on grass over five seasons,or even a smudge on Nadal’s 81-match purple patch on clay? These too are record streaks,ones where form stayed constant,week after week,season after season.

Advertisement

In 2011 so far,Djokovic has seized control of everything he’s stepped on,conquering Melbourne,the hard courts of Dubai,Indian Wells,Miami and his beloved home town of Belgrade. But it was the last two clay tournaments of Madrid and Rome that forced the gaping spectators to replace his joker tag with that of king. Taming Nadal twice on his surface of choice probably had something to do with it. With a fantastic command over his double-handed backhand,Djokovic has negated Nadal’s affinity to break down the weaker side of a tennis player. By hitting lower and flatter while standing on the edge of the baseline,he has countered the unbelievable top-spin revolutions the Spaniard gives to a tennis ball. It’s easy for an above-average player to look good on the run,but only a true champion,as Djokovic is turning out to be,shows his class from defensive positions and pressure zones.

What makes for an interesting case study is the eagerness with which the modern-day tennis fan waits to kill the prophets. Even before Djokovic can go on to do anything substantial (winning two Australian Opens doesn’t gain anyone an entry into the pantheon of the great),Federer is erased from popular memory. All this while he is still the third in world rankings. His record 16 Slams,a trophy on every surface,an unbelievable 237 weeks on top of the world and a half-dozen encryptions on London’s SW 19 helped him capture the human mind with possibilities,much the way Laver did. Blessed with an art that both W.B. Yeats and Jimmy Page would have been inspired by,Federer’s technical skill-set bordered on flawlessness. And by the time he was Djokovic’s age,he had won three of the four majors,and a total of six Slams.

To put things in perspective,Federer has had two consecutive all-surface streaks of over 35 — Sampras’s best was 32. Djokovic,going for broke ever since he won the Davis Cup for his country,has had one terribly long and astonishingly successful run. Even labelling him Federer’s successor is an insult,as Nadal,just a year older than the Serb,has won nine Slams to Djokovic’s two — in all four cities to Djokovic’s one.

Djokovic could very well be the new prototype in the art to command the baseline for future generations. But as far as being the greatest is concerned,his truest test will begin once the amnesia-inducing streak is broken. The moon,in Djokovic’s case,is still an astronomical distance away.

aditya.iyer@expressindia.com

Curated For You
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
🎊 New Year SaleGet Express Edge 1-Year Subscription for just Rs 1,273.99! Use Code NEWIE25
X