Premium

Opinion Raf makes the cut

Christian Dior finds John Galliano’s replacement in minimalist Belgian designer Raf Simons

April 14, 2012 12:13 AM IST First published on: Apr 14, 2012 at 12:13 AM IST

Christian Dior finds John Galliano’s replacement in minimalist Belgian designer Raf Simons

The boots have been filled. Finally. Over a year after firing fashion’s loved-up genius John Galliano over racial comments made during an inebriated bar brawl,legendary French fashion house Christian Dior appointed Raf Simons as its new artistic director. Simons,like Galliano before him,will head the couture lines,women’s wear and accessories for the very profitable luxury label,making him one of the most powerful designers in the world.

Advertisement

Simons is an unusual choice. His career path has been irreverent,to say the least. He began as a furniture designer; then,he hibernated into some introspection only to discover his mettle in menswear. He was no short of genius himself,his iconoclastic clothes for men — a style he called “tortured youth” — ironically made him comparable to the big daddies of the business. Since 2005,he was helming the Jil Sander label,a women’s fashion line known for its avant garde minimalism and a favourite of rich female CEOs.

The Christian Dior label,on the other hand,is the absolute opposite of Simons’s aesthetic. It is rich,opulent and excessive. Dior founded the label just after World War II,an escapist’s daydream after Europe’s physical and fiscal ruin. Since the passing of its founder,the Christian Dior label suffered this image for too long,until 1996,when Bernard Arnault,chairman of the Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy group that owns a majority stake in Dior,appointed British rebel Galliano.

Galliano pored over Dior’s archives,tore up its avuncular image,and reconstructed it with his own sensational signature. He was modern and historic at the same time,he drew from cultures across the world and yet was supremely French,he was witty and classical at once. Dior was in the black again. And Galliano was God.

Advertisement

Last March,after 15 years at the top of his game,Galliano was sacked after some customers at a bar in Le Marais lodged a police complaint against his anti-Semitic comments. A cellphone video grab was the clincher: a punch-drunk Galliano slurred insults at a Jewish woman and said “I love Hitler”. Many in the fashion industry,especially the press,felt sorry for him and thought that his sacking was severe. This was quiet,albeit rude,private banter in a pub,not a public place. Wasn’t Prince Harry let off with just an apology for wearing a Nazi suit to a costume party? Supermodel Natalia Vodianova defended Galliano by saying “he is under the influence of a disease. This is beyond his power.”

The malaise being a tortured creative soul among an office of suit. The house of Dior,one of the top three most-successful fashion labels in the world,was known to be a tough taskmaster. Multiple store openings in emerging Asian markets,added to the stress of designing several (critically acclaimed) lines each year,took its toll.

It was typical of “the suits” to build someone up and bring them down with an ear-ringing thud. Tom Ford was ousted from Gucci for becoming bigger than the brand. Alexander McQueen was pink-slipped from Givenchy for being too modern; but he died as one of the most important designers of the 21st century.

The first few months after Galliano’s dismissal,it seemed as if Dior was waiting for the smoke to settle. Then reports of other designers refusing to head Dior came to light. The first was Tunisia-born,Paris-based Azzedine Alaia,a reclusive designer revered by fashion absolutists as a visionary. Alaia would have been a coup for Dior,but the designer stated he didn’t agree with the marketing-driven logic of luxe conglomerates and rejected the offer. Haider Ackermann and Alber Elbaz of Lanvin were other names that were bandied about,Ackermann’s presence at Dior’s spring shows this year only added to the speculation. Louis Vuitton’s Marc Jacobs was in the news too,but the American star designer refused,reportedly over money. (Getting Jacobs to leave his beloved muse New York for Paris would have been an Augean task.) Dior’s in-house designer and Galliano’s former right-hand,Bill Gaytten,kept the seat warm. Dior’s collections last year were stupendous in technique but lacked a vision. Menkes called their January couture line “emotionless”. All of last year,Dior advertised its money-churning handbags,almost as if to deflect attention from its runway shows. Joining Natalie Portman and Marion Cotillard was American actress Mila Kunis. Dior rang up a profit of $1.39 billion last year.

Last November,Arnault and his daughter,Delphine,the deputy director of Dior,began talks with Simons. This February,Simons was forced to leave Jil Sander when the label’s founder,Sander herself,decided to return to her label (she had lost the title when the Prada group bought it over). The New York Times fashion critic Cathy Horyn,who is close to Simons,tweeted from the Milan Fashion Week on February 23,saying this would be Simons’s last collection for Jil Sander.

If his vein is dissimilar to Dior’s,his temperament is contrary to the flamboyant Galliano’s. Simons is known to answer his office phone in Antwerp,while Galliano was a fashion star with moods,whims and indulgences. Like many others around him, Simons’s talent is unquestionable. He is hugely influential and draws from street-style fashion. He comes from the Antwerp school of deconstructionist design,widely respected as intellectually appealing. All eyes will be trained on him as he makes his Dior debut this July in Paris.

Simons will be welcomed alright,but it will be a melancholic,nostalgic cheer.

Namrata Zakaria is a writer on fashion and luxury

Curated For You
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
🎊 New Year SaleGet Express Edge 1-Year Subscription for just Rs 1,273.99! Use Code NEWIE25
X