Premium
This is an archive article published on June 21, 2010
Premium

Opinion Municipal musings

India’s small towns: our future,but always someone else’s problem....

June 21, 2010 12:17 AM IST First published on: Jun 21, 2010 at 12:17 AM IST

Large Indian cities are doing reasonably well. Ahmedabad,where I stay,has been voted one of the ten most attractive towns in India and once the adjoining panchayats became a part of the municipal corporation,it’s a great place for a morning walk. The same is true for many other metropolises work might take you to. But I go to smaller towns,when the economics fraternity calls me; I travel to rural areas in Maharashtra,UP and Punjab,to name a few places where my work carries me. Invariably some of the small towns I stay in,were a few years ago,large villages whether Kim,Rahata,or a taluka place between Lucknow and Barabanki.

They have grown from a population of around 20,000 to 1 lakh or more. The growth is usually around the industrialisation of a metro or a large town,or agro processing/marketing,as in Surat,Nashik,Ahmednagar or central UP. The household size is not large,for there is a large migrant population. The migrants are happy,for even with a little skill they would get around Rs 300 a day,in post-NREGA India. So are the local traders,well-off farmer families,the college principal — for everyone loves prosperity and rising capital values.

Advertisement

But life is bad. There is no public water supply. In fact in most such places,even in the “good” local hotel,it is quite common for muck to come in the bathroom tap that’s fed from groundwater. There is a networked input-output system; there is no drainage and open defecation is common. Housing is coming up apace and the BOD — a polite name for shit — goes back in the open plots and percolates through in time. It is sometimes pumped back into the aquifer. Apart from the traders and farmers the local doctors are also obviously happy. If you raise these issues you are considered grumpy.

The Eleventh Plan has a very sage sentence on the “coverage of urban population with water supply facilities had not been very impressive”. Ahem. It is also unhappy on sanitation and,living up to the planners’ reputation for being practical,gives some statistics to show that the smaller a town is the worse off it is. They say that in 1994 there was an accelerated water supply programme for small towns.

The plan now is in a PPP mode. There does not seem anything special seen for small towns. I suspect what is called the viability gap is much larger there. Everybody is so happy making money for the first time in their civilisational history that I am not quite clear who will lead the PPP brigade. Where is the water going to come from anyway? Land use planning in the sense that transport and other infrastructure should be built up where it is possible,and habitations around it — is infra dig,being relegated to “socialist mindsets”. In some of the towns I went to and raised these questions asking for initiatives (PPPs),I get a mouthful: “You know sir,the real problem is that those who come from outside are not interested. When they come they say they are vegetarians and don’t drink,but soon spoil our culture.”

Advertisement

The problem is in a sense getting more acute. This column has argued that urbanisation has moved much faster than anticipated: 1.1 million persons in Gujarat,for example,live in places which have all the characteristics of towns in 2001,but are not declared as such. This was happening slowly; now it is an avalanche. It is of some importance that we anticipate the movement of workers from villages to cities. The process may not be benign as I want it to be,but it should at least not be cruel. I am an unrepentant admirer of NREGA and food security,but when that poor mother comes to a small town with her girl child she must have the conditions where what she gets from the food she earns go to her vitals.

There is the environmental angle too,but we can’t push too many things at one time. Suffice it to say that many of the lakes and rivers which gave towns small and big,water for drinking and sanitation are now drains,as the pollution guys tell us every year with frightening data. And like me if you love to go to the backwaters at least every odd year,here is what Dr S. Anbumani and his gang at the Indira Gandhi Centre of Atomic Research have to tell us on the cytogenetic damage in “fishes” inhabiting the backwaters of Kalpakkam: “DNA damage due to chronic low dose exposures to chemicals and other environmental mutagens through erythrocyte cytome assay.” They too have the

Bengali failing of saying that the plural of fish is fishes,but don’t say they did not warn us.

The writer,a former Union minister,is chairman,Institute of Rural Management,Anand

express@expressindia.com

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments