This generation, Franklin D. Roosevelt said of his contemporaries,has a rendezvous with destiny. Our generation at least,its leaders,judging by the likely results of this weeks Group of 20 meeting in London is doing its damnedest to duck anything so momentous.
The G-20 leaders havent failed for lack of ideas. The Obama administration has made a compelling case that nothing short of a coordinated global stimulus can fix a global recession. The leaders of continental Europe,French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in particular,have argued persuasively that the excesses of global finance require global regulations administered by global agencies. In the end,having duly considered each others proposals for global stimulus and global regulation,the two sides reached a compromise. They would do neither.
If continental Europe isnt keen on meeting a global stimulus target,neither is the US keen on setting up global regulators for global finance. In an interview with the Financial Times,Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner admitted that national reforms would not work unless we are able to bring others along with us. He added,however,that we are not going to give anyone else the responsibility for deciding what balance between stability and efficiency is right for our markets. In a pre-global economy,Geithners caveat would be unexceptionable. But in a world where banks such as Citigroup or Goldman Sachs operate in scores of nations,uniform standards of leverage are both prudent and necessary. At a time when the global economy needs global rules,Geithners anti-globalism is nothing less than a new form of protectionism.
But neither global rules nor global stimulus is likely to emerge from this weeks G-20 summit. This generation of world leaders has a rendezvous with inadequacy.