Can this jolt the Congress into action or is it another chapter in Rahuls political science primer?
If there is a story that is common to the verdict from the states,it is this: the Congress was not able to seize the moment,or the anti-incumbency vote,mainly because it lacked,even disdained,a local-level leadership and organisation. First,take a look at Punjab. In the run-up to polls,it was the state that had returned successive decisive verdicts against the incumbent. The Shiromani Akali Dal,it was assumed,would not be able to survive this rote law of anti-incumbency. Yet,if the SAD has stayed on,and most decisively so,it is not only because it managed to change the subject to development and showcase its governments initiatives an enormously impressive achievement for a party that had been till recently identified with a panthic agenda and anti-Centre resentments. It is also because as the main opposition party,the Congress gave such a shambolic account of itself. The announcement of Captain Amarinder Singh as the partys chief ministerial candidate in the week before polling day proved to be wholly inadequate in stanching the bleeding in a campaign no local Congress leader had been encouraged to take ownership of.
The Congress high commands unwillingness to relinquish the strings in Punjab and its leaders crafting of an appeal that vaults over the need for a local party organisation in UP are part of the same pattern. Reacting to the results,Rahul Gandhi said this was a good lesson for him. What is that lesson,few in the party have the courage to spell out. But the Congress should know that the voter doesnt have the patience to wait for the party leaders to see the light. She is going to watch what the Congress does or does not do with the power it has at the Centre. In a way,therefore,the countdown to 2014 may have just begun.