Premium
This is an archive article published on June 3, 2011

Riddikulus!

Maybe Naipaul has done us a favour putting a world of subtle sexist bias in bald words

V.S. Naipaul has a genius for giving offence. His remarks are often riveting,not because of their provocative honesty as he might fondly believe,but because of their unfairness and inaccuracy. This time,hes trained his bleary sights on that old,old subject scribbling women and their narrow,sentimental worlds.

Women writers are different,they are quite different. I read a piece of writing and within a paragraph or two I know whether it is by a woman or not. This pinched quality,in his view,comes from a woman not being,inevitably,the complete master of a house. Women can be helpmeets and enablers,but they cant do grand sweep,sum up an age or a people in Naipauls own magisterial style. No,not even Jane Austen could aspire to equality with him. His own publisher,he says,who was so good as a taster and editor,when she became a writer,lo and behold it was all this feminine tosh.

Naipauls remarks are only warming over a decades-old debate,but they deserve to be responded to,simply because these vile stereotypes live on in the literary world,and inform critical reception,course material,anthologies and histories. While these Jane Austen subjects motherhood,marriage,the neighbourhood,and so on are no less important than war and travel and nationhood,we know women writers have taken on both these traditions with aplomb. However,while men who address these intimate themes,from John Updike to Jonathan Franzen,are heralded as makers of mighty works,women get a perfunctory critical pat. The political dimensions of their work are effaced Harriet Beecher Stowe was asked by Lincoln if she was the little woman who wrote the little book that started the great war. Naipaul,with his gift for caricature,has taken that inchoate prejudice and put it out there in the clearest possible words,so people can see it for the laughable lie it is.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement