
Before this fortnight is over,the United States will know their next president though given the recent history of legally challenged results in that country,it may be wise not to hedge any bets on this.
Before this fortnight is over,the United States will know their next president though given the recent history of legally challenged results in that country,it may be wise not to hedge any bets on this. Perhaps,what can be counted upon with more confidence is that no matter which way the election goes,whether Barack Obama wins the elections or not,his will be the profile that most people will reassess with greater gusto,not Mitt Romneys. Not since Gandhiji used the personal to rally ever more people towards very public and politically transformative causes has anyone updated,in real time,his biographical detail as vividly as Obama has done in an exercise in persuasive politics and diplomacy.
You could argue that Obama will need the power of his story to claw his way back from the setback after his first debate with Romney; and you can be certain that should he fail to do so,a fine memoir will be hot off presses some time not too far away and that should he,in fact,win,that book will be just another four years and a bit away. Either way,it will take a while for a sober assessment of the Obama way as a template for political engagement. But its not too early to use this opportunity to shine a questioning light on the art of the memoir.
The Obama context and a reading of Dreams From My Father extraordinarily textured and,in hindsight,written amazingly well to withstand the scrutiny of fact-checkers and political opponents at a time he may have had little inkling of the public profile he would one day acquire may in fact provide the appropriate moment. In an essay in a collection of previously published writings just out Waiting for the Barbarians,literary critic Daniel Mendelsohn cautions against ignoring the great autobiographies while participating in a routine ritual of trashing tell-alls born of vanity,narcissism,spite,greed,self-regard and delusion. Those provocations are easy to spot and judge. More interesting is a question that Mendelsohn lingers on: the utility of autobiographical narratives that turn out to be works of fiction.
An example he cites is Rigoberta Menchu,Guatemalan winner of the 1992 Nobel peace prize for her work in promoting the rights of indigenous people. She hit the headlines for the wrong reasons when it subsequently came to light that she had made up some of the incidents and even persons mentioned in her 1983 memoir. Upon being so charged,she retorted that the book highlighted a larger truth. Taking a few more examples of more extravagantly invented memoirs that nonetheless claim to utter essential truths,Mendelsohn passes judgment: Such claims add up to quite a valid defence of a certain literary genre,but the genre in question isnt the memoir its the novel.
Yet,if recollections are not intentionally fiction,do they become incontestable facts? How reliable a guide is memory,after all? Mendelsohn recalls returning from Australia after interviewing Holocaust survivors in an effort to find out what had happened to his mothers Polish relatives. On the flight back,his brother and he had an argument about whether the former had in fact been on the school choir. Mendelsohn wondered that he could not settle a fact of a past much more recent than that his interviewees were talking about. I thought about this and burst out laughing. Then I went home and wrote the book, he concludes.
mini.kapoorexpressindia.com