Herman Cain became badly flustered on Monday when asked to assess President Obamas policy toward Libya,raising new questions about his command of foreign policy as he lurched over five minutes from awkward pauses to halting efforts to address the issue.
Video of Cains appearance on Monday before editors and reporters at The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel went viral almost immediately after it was posted online,and drew immediate comparisons to Rick Perrys recent stumble in a debate when he froze in discussing which federal agencies he would eliminate.
At the interview in Milwaukee,after he was asked his thoughts on Obamas handling of Libya,Cain leaned back and appeared to search for an answer: O.K.,Libya, he said.
President Obama supported the uprising,correct? he asked. President Obama called for the removal of Gaddafi just want to make sure were talking about the same thing before I say Yes,I agree, or No,I didnt agree.
Cain said he disagreed with the presidents approach for the following reasons then changed course.
Nope,thats a different one, he said. Ive got to go back and see. He added: Ive got all this stuff twirling around in my head.
Some analysts have grown sharply critical of Cains foreign policy pronouncements in debates and interviews,saying he shows a basic lack of understanding of critical regions of the world. His comments about Libya came after a string of other provocative remarks about foreign policy and related issues. Those include a statement published Monday in which Cain suggested that most American Muslims are extremists; a contradictory answer about waterboarding during a Republican presidential primary debate on Saturday; and his statement that if al-Qaeda demanded,he would consider authorising the release of every detainee at Guantánamo Bay in return for the release of one US soldier.RICHARD A OPPEL JR.